Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
my projects - instead I have to keep coming up with new prefixes. I
already have gg_utils.pas, mm_utils.pas, fpg_utils.pas, m2c_utils.pas
for some of my projects. It would be awesome if I can simply use
utils.pas and define a namespace via a compiler parameter.
How s
Op 2010-07-26 02:45, Hans-Peter Diettrich het geskryf:
>
> How should that work? How to distinguish between utils.pas and
> utils.pas, in "using utils;"?
I'm thinking in the line of working with something like Lazarus Packages.
This is not limited to Lazarus only though. When I talk about a "laz
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Op 2010-07-26 02:45, Hans-Peter Diettrich het geskryf:
How should that work? How to distinguish between utils.pas and
utils.pas, in "using utils;"?
I'm thinking in the line of working with something like Lazarus Packages.
This is not limited to Lazarus only though. W
Hi!
On 26.07.2010 12:11, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
If ever, I'd agree about (project wide) symbolic names for library
directories. Then the file location is given once, in the program or
package settings (search path), easily adoptable to any installation,
and then a package unit can be qualif
Op 2010-07-26 13:20, Sven Barth het geskryf:
>
> Would you mind adding this idea to the Namespace-thread on fpc-pascal,
> so that there is one place of discussion?
It also doesn't help that I accidentally posted the new thread to the
fpc-pascal mailing list, instead of the intended fpc-devel mai
