Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:12:25 +0200 (CEST)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The text mode IDE can display statisics while compiling. Why can't
Lazarus?
There is the compiler unit, which *is* available, and this is the
only officially supported compiler
Zitat von Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:12:25 +0200 (CEST)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The text mode IDE can display statisics while compiling. Why can't
Lazarus?
There is the compiler unit, which *is*
Zitat von Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In our previous episode, Mattias Gärtner said:
Any progress?
IIRC, we once had the idea to feed the compiler an error message file
with only error numbers as error messages so parsing would be easier.
The error number is needed,
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
There are no pseudo terminals on win32, I must use pipes. The current 2.0.3
RTL does not flush output on writeln if the filehandle is a pipe (2.0.2
does!). So the IDE target console window is unusable on win32 with FPC 2.0.3
RTL and works OK with FPC 2.0.2 RTL.
;-)
Op Wed, 13 Aug 2008, schreef Vincent Snijders:
It easier to change the message parser if you change it, than to design a
protocol for more computer friendly messages.
It's not about what is less work. It's about what has the
best compatibility, the best maintainability, the best
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Wed, 13 Aug 2008, schreef Vincent Snijders:
Daniël Mantione schreef:
Op Wed, 13 Aug 2008, schreef Vincent Snijders:
It easier to change the message parser if you change it, than to
design a
Daniël Mantione schreef:
Op Wed, 13 Aug 2008, schreef Vincent Snijders:
Daniël Mantione schreef:
Op Wed, 13 Aug 2008, schreef Vincent Snijders:
It easier to change the message parser if you change it, than to
design a protocol for more computer friendly messages.
It's not about what is