Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 19.09.2014 um 22:49 schrieb Boian Mitov:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect any
aspect of an object.
It was/is not meant for that.
<<<
Quite incorrect. All languages with modern RTTI allow
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
From: Sven Barth
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 2:05 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
Maybe you could document the binary format of the extended RTTI data. That
Am 20.09.2014 21:40 schrieb "Boian Mitov" :
>
> If the compiler information is generated, I can work on the API to access
it. I think I can easily port my API to do that, and can contribute the
version to the open source project.
Maybe you could document the binary format of the extended RTTI data
www.mitov.com
---
From: Sven Barth
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 12:32 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
Am 20.09.2014 18:05 schrieb "Florian Klämpfl" :
It depends what you define as finishe
Am 20.09.2014 18:05 schrieb "Florian Klämpfl" :
>
> Am 20.09.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
> >
> > Personally, I can't wait to see Joost's implementation of extended RTTI
and attributes merged to the
> > trunk compiler.
>
> Is it finished? I thought it is still work in progress?
It de
Am 20.09.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> Personally, I can't wait to see Joost's implementation of extended RTTI and
> attributes merged to the
> trunk compiler.
Is it finished? I thought it is still work in progress?
___
fpc-devel mail
Am 19.09.2014 um 22:49 schrieb Boian Mitov:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
>
> Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect any
> aspect of an object.
> It was/is not meant for that.
> <<<
>
> Quite incorrect. All languages with modern RTTI allow for f
On 20.09.2014 12:11, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Sven Barth schrieb:
Am 20.09.2014 01:52 schrieb "Hans-Peter Diettrich"
> It's up to the coder to make all properties etc. published, when he
*intends* to ever use RTTI on them. That't the way to tell the
compiler what to do.
The extended RT
Sven Barth schrieb:
Am 20.09.2014 01:52 schrieb "Hans-Peter Diettrich"
> It's up to the coder to make all properties etc. published, when he
*intends* to ever use RTTI on them. That't the way to tell the compiler
what to do.
The extended RTTI introduced with Delphi 2010 allows you to even q
---
-Original Message- From: Jonas Maebe
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 2:10 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On 19/09/14 22:49, Boian Mitov wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTT
I will add quick comment to this discussion: our products heavily rely on
the "automated" keyword, introduced in Delphi 2. What we use it for is
either to link dynamically GUI elements to particular code, or to do a
particular form of RPC. That is, the gui does not in advance the structure
of the
Am 20.09.2014 00:46 schrieb "Boian Mitov" :
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> Thank you!
> This is all great news. I perfectly understand, and I also support some
open source projects.
> However the dynamic packages have been in the works for at least 5-6
years if I recall.
There wasn't that much work that went
Am 20.09.2014 01:52 schrieb "Hans-Peter Diettrich" :
>
> Boian Mitov schrieb:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
>>
>
>> Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect
any aspect of an object.
>> It was/is not meant for that.
>> <<<
>>
>> Quite incorrect. All
Am 20.09.2014 05:01 schrieb "Den" :
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> What would you say the status on Generic Methods/Functions if you
were to give a status for it?
In my local repository I have global functions/procedures working
(something that Delphi can not ;) ), but methods not yet. Also I still have
som
On 20/09/14 00:07, Boian Mitov wrote:
> ---
> -Original Message- From: Jonas Maebe
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 2:10 PM
> To: FPC developers' list
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
>
>> Why do
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Boian Mitov wrote:
Hi Sven,
Thank you!
This is all great news. I perfectly understand, and I also support some open
source projects.
However the dynamic packages have been in the works for at least 5-6 years if I
recall.
If the product does not catch up on at least s
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Boian Mitov wrote:
> Hi Silvio,
>
> Please contact me at mi...@mitov.com, and I will send it to you.
> It is for XE4 and higher only however since older XE versions have some
> compiler issues.
> It is a new API design from the ground up, making everything ex
---
From: silvioprog
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 8:41 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Boian Mitov wrote:
I was very curious to see your RTTI API. :-)
--
Silvio Clécio
My public pro
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Boian Mitov wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> I am sorry to disagree with you.
>
+1.
> The attributes in particular allow you to do real magic, and reduce your
> code by at least 4 times, and speed up your development up to 10 times.
>
I tested the new RTTI in Delphi XE
Hi Sven,
What would you say the status on Generic Methods/Functions if you
were to give a status for it?
- Dennis Fehr
P.S. I see you added CPPClass support to the bottom of that list, very
much looking forward to that too! .. I know it's kinda a bit difficult
as you have to follow the
Well, what frustrates me is that there are always people that come up
with all kinds of fancy ideas/add-ons/additions that bring absolutely
nothing in "real" improvement
Ahem, it seems when people DO bring patches and improvements to the
table, they never get accepted, and discourage any m
With best regards,
Boian Mitov
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 4:28 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re:
Boian Mitov schrieb:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect
any aspect of an object.
It was/is not meant for that.
<<<
Quite incorrect. All languages with modern RTTI allow for full object
inspection, and that includ
---
From: Sven Barth
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 3:19 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
Am 19.09.2014 23:39 schrieb "Boian Mitov" :
> I even offered to donate our enhanced RTTI API to the
Am 19.09.2014 23:39 schrieb "Boian Mitov" :
> I even offered to donate our enhanced RTTI API to the FPC community with
very little interest so far :-( .
Your API would be welcome, but it's of no use when we don't yet generate
the data your API relies on. And implementing that takes a sufficient
am
@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On 9/19/2014 2:38 PM, Boian Mitov wrote:
I really want to become FPC/Lazarus a really stable, reliable
development, across multiple platforms, without constantly trying to run
along the other "kool kids on the
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 2:10 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On 19/09/14 22:49, Boian Mitov wrote:
Why do you take one paragraph out of context and base a whole rant on
that which ignores the other information from the original messag
On 9/19/2014 2:38 PM, Boian Mitov wrote:
Hi Jonas,
I am sorry if I have misinterpreted the meaning of the message.
I am just terribly frustrated with the overall state of the FPC :-( .
Well, what frustrates me is that there are always people that come up
with all kinds of fancy ideas/add-ons/a
, September 19, 2014 2:14 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Boian Mitov wrote:
I may be wrong, but if I'm not mistaken, the new Delphi XE RTTI is being
implemented in FPC.
My dream is see a project like DORM
(http
, September 19, 2014 2:10 PM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On 19/09/14 22:49, Boian Mitov wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect
any aspect of an object.
It was/is not meant for
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Boian Mitov wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
>
>
Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect
> any aspect of an object.
> It was/is not meant for that.
> <<<
>
> Quite incorrect. All languages with modern RTTI all
On 19/09/14 22:49, Boian Mitov wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
>
> Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect
> any aspect of an object.
> It was/is not meant for that.
> <<<
>
> Quite incorrect. All languages with modern RTTI allow for full obj
4 3:44 AM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] RTTI generating
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Your remarks seem to imply that you think RTTI can be used to inspect any
aspect of an object.
It was/is not meant for that.
___
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Adriaan van Os wrote:
This is a copy of a post on the macpascal mailing list, where it was
suggested to re-ask on the fpc-devel list.
-
The RTTI generating logic in the FPC compiler puzzles me
Chapter 40 of FreePascal Run-Time Library Reference guide describ
This is a copy of a post on the macpascal mailing list, where it was suggested to re-ask on the
fpc-devel list.
-
The RTTI generating logic in the FPC compiler puzzles me
Chapter 40 of FreePascal Run-Time Library Reference guide describes the typinfo
unit. It says
; The TypeInfo u
35 matches
Mail list logo
