> Hello, Marco - thanks for your reply...
>
> > fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it,
> > and it wasn't supposed to be used directly.
>
> It is well-documented in the FPC 1.0.7 manual,
> ( along with example code ) and no mention is
> made about not using it.
Indeed. However thi
Hello, Marco - thanks for your reply...
> fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it,
> and it wasn't supposed to be used directly.
It is well-documented in the FPC 1.0.7 manual,
( along with example code ) and no mention is
made about not using it.
> generic functions exported via