Re: [fpc-devel] Re: What happened to fexpand()

2005-03-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
> Hello, Marco - thanks for your reply... > > > fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it, > > and it wasn't supposed to be used directly. > > It is well-documented in the FPC 1.0.7 manual, > ( along with example code ) and no mention is > made about not using it. Indeed. However thi

[fpc-devel] Re: What happened to fexpand()

2005-03-03 Thread Jeff Pohlmeyer
Hello, Marco - thanks for your reply... > fexpand was in unit linux because unit dos used it, > and it wasn't supposed to be used directly. It is well-documented in the FPC 1.0.7 manual, ( along with example code ) and no mention is made about not using it. > generic functions exported via