On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Joerg Schuelke wrote:
> Am Tue, 10 May 2011 11:11:22 -0300
> schrieb Marcos Douglas :
>
>> PS: BTW, what the difference (at least on Win) to use option "install"
>> in 'make'?
>
> Thats not windows related, make works the same way on all platforms.
> The arguments
Am Tue, 10 May 2011 11:11:22 -0300
schrieb Marcos Douglas :
> PS: BTW, what the difference (at least on Win) to use option "install"
> in 'make'?
Thats not windows related, make works the same way on all platforms.
The arguments for make are:
- options for make himself
- targets (which parts of c
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Joerg Schuelke wrote:
> Am Mon, 9 May 2011 17:23:30 -0300
> schrieb Marcos Douglas :
>
>> > I use /fixes_2_4 but I could not to compile (error in first mail).
>> > So, I took a look in sources from /trunk. I compared this files
>> > (odbcsql) and saw this difference
Am Mon, 9 May 2011 17:23:30 -0300
schrieb Marcos Douglas :
> > I use /fixes_2_4 but I could not to compile (error in first mail).
> > So, I took a look in sources from /trunk. I compared this files
> > (odbcsql) and saw this difference between them (the patch).
>
> Did you understand?
I think
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:14 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Joost van der Sluis
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 0
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:14 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:47 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Mar
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:14 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:47 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I resolved. Path in attachment (copy
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:47 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> > >
> > > I resolved. Path in attachment (copy from /trunk).
> > >
> >
> > Hello, somebody can confirm this, please?
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 07:47 -0300, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> >
> > I resolved. Path in attachment (copy from /trunk).
> >
>
> Hello, somebody can confirm this, please?
A quick look on your patch is that you want to include the 32-bit odbc
dri
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> I resolved. Path in attachment (copy from /trunk).
>
Hello, somebody can confirm this, please?
Thanks.
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was compiling the FPC and the computer was turned off by
>> accidentally... so, I turn on again and tried to compile. I could not.
>>
>> ERROR:
>> make[4]: Leaving directory
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> Hi,
> I was compiling the FPC and the computer was turned off by
> accidentally... so, I turn on again and tried to compile. I could not.
>
> ERROR:
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `W:/md/dev/freepascal/compiler/2.4.3/packages/oracle'
> make[
12 matches
Mail list logo
