On 11/05/2012 09:28 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
all the other younger children => arm, powerpc(64), sparc,
mips(el), x86_64, jvm (, aarch64 ;) ) - most of them were "born"
during the rewrite
(not mentioned, but the children that are dead (at least so far)
=> alpha, itanium, vis)
Is "aarch64
On 11/06/2012 04:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
* primitve procedural programs do definitely work
This sounds very promising for me, as my planned application is not on a
formal OS, but I'll need to build a wrapper to make the Pascal
procedures run on my homebrew OS.
I'll just need a decently work
Am 06.11.2012 09:13, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 11/05/2012 09:28 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
the "young mage" => me :)
Could you publish a state report on how powerful the actual magic has
become ?
If you mean how far the m68k port has come now, sure:
* currently the only tested "environment" i
On 11/05/2012 09:28 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
the "young mage" => me :)
Could you publish a state report on how powerful the actual magic has
become ?
Thanks,
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.or
I go back rather (too?) far...eg pre v1.0 - unfortunately I can't remember
what the version was when I first downloaded fpk & tried to compile an fft
- it crashed compiler - fixed by Jonas iirc. I'm so sad that I still use
fpk for fpc directories - I'm kind'a sorry we changed that. I sort of got
On 18.10.2012 13:13, Sven Barth wrote:
Once upon a time there was a small kingdom ruled by a kind king. The
king had two daughters and more children were planned to come. But the
king had already problems to find approbiate rooms for his second child.
So he ordered his mages to reconstruct the ca
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd <
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Yes, a IIIe I scrounged. I believe there's a Pascal compiler for it but
> I've never tried running it.
>
> I believe that the Palms were at one time popular as a "brain" for
> mobile robot experimen
Michael Schnell wrote:
As my system obviously does not run Linux, I hope I might be able to
provide some kind of infrastructure that allows to decently execute FPC
generated files. (This maybe in fact is similar to what QEMU does -
without the code-interpreter.)
I've never really tried to ge
On 10/19/2012 03:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
It would be easier if you'd use the C code from within FPC code.
I don't think I can easily do this, as there is a booting system called
"Leash" provided by Innovasic, that finally runs the user code
(everything is compiled to a single loadable/executab
Am 19.10.2012 15:15, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 10/19/2012 01:23 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The question is in how far the Fido is compatible with the Motorola CPUs.
It's nearly 100% code-bit compatible with the 332 (aka CPU32), there are
some additions to provide multi-threading and power-Managem
On 10/19/2012 01:23 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
The question is in how far the Fido is compatible with the Motorola CPUs.
It's nearly 100% code-bit compatible with the 332 (aka CPU32), there are
some additions to provide multi-threading and power-Management (e.g. the
"trapx" and "sleep" instructions
Am 19.10.2012 13:10, schrieb Michael Schnell:
> On 10/18/2012 05:58 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>> Pierre was right. M68k is BACK!
> GREAT ! Thanks a lot.
>
> We just developed a board featuring a "Fido" chip by Innovasic. The
> prototype is sitting on my desk since the beginning of this week.
>
> Fido
On 10/18/2012 05:58 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Pierre was right. M68k is BACK!
GREAT ! Thanks a lot.
We just developed a board featuring a "Fido" chip by Innovasic. The
prototype is sitting on my desk since the beginning of this week.
Fido is a very nice upgrade to the Mortorola 68332 chip
(har
waldo kitty wrote:
On 10/18/2012 13:22, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Sven Barth wrote:
But now the solution (I can't hold it back any longer myself ^^):
Pierre was
right. M68k is BACK!
Nicely done.
but I also plan to test Aranym (which emulates a M68040)
I was impressed by it, unpretentious
On 10/18/2012 13:22, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Sven Barth wrote:
But now the solution (I can't hold it back any longer myself ^^): Pierre was
right. M68k is BACK!
Nicely done.
but I also plan to test Aranym (which emulates a M68040)
I was impressed by it, unpretentious but effective. The o
Am 18.10.2012 22:20 schrieb "Florian Klaempfl" :
>
> Am 18.10.2012 22:16, schrieb Sven Barth:
>
>> On 18.10.2012 13:13, Sven Barth wrote:
>>>
>>> Over the past weeks I've spent some time on getting something to work in
>>> FPC and now I'm about to commit this either this evening or at least
>>> thi
Am 18.10.2012 22:16, schrieb Sven Barth:
On 18.10.2012 13:13, Sven Barth wrote:
Over the past weeks I've spent some time on getting something to work in
FPC and now I'm about to commit this either this evening or at least
this weekend (depending on the time I have).
I've now commited my change
On 18.10.2012 13:13, Sven Barth wrote:
Over the past weeks I've spent some time on getting something to work in
FPC and now I'm about to commit this either this evening or at least
this weekend (depending on the time I have).
I've now commited my changes, but currently the compiler for m68k can
Sven Barth wrote:
But now the solution (I can't hold it back any longer myself ^^): Pierre
was right. M68k is BACK!
Nicely done.
but I also plan to test Aranym (which emulates a M68040)
I was impressed by it, unpretentious but effective. The only /real/ 68k
I've got is a Palm on alarm clo
Am 18.10.2012 13:13, schrieb Sven Barth:
Over the past weeks I've spent some time on getting something to work in
FPC and now I'm about to commit this either this evening or at least
this weekend (depending on the time I have). Now I thought that I'd make
a little test to see how good you know FP
20 matches
Mail list logo
