Hi,
Shouldn't ReallocMem in CMem zero the newly allocated bytes ?
Micha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Op Wed, 8 Mar 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
Hi,
Shouldn't ReallocMem in CMem zero the newly allocated bytes ?
No, it is the responsibility of the programmer.
Daniël___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:10:38 +0100 (CET)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Wed, 8 Mar 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
Shouldn't ReallocMem in CMem zero the newly allocated bytes ?
No, it is the responsibility of the programmer.
Nope. At least the compiler depends on it being
On 8 mrt 2006, at 18:19, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Shouldn't ReallocMem in CMem zero the newly allocated bytes ?
No, it is the responsibility of the programmer.
Nope. At least the compiler depends on it being zeroed.
Where? It's a bug if it does.
The FPC heap
manager zeroes it, as well.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:19:40 +0100
Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:10:38 +0100 (CET)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Wed, 8 Mar 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
Shouldn't ReallocMem in CMem zero the newly allocated bytes ?
No, it is the
Op Wed, 8 Mar 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:10:38 +0100 (CET)
Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Wed, 8 Mar 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
Shouldn't ReallocMem in CMem zero the newly allocated bytes ?
No, it is the responsibility of the
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:33:53 +0100
Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. At least the compiler depends on it being zeroed. The FPC heap
manager zeroes it, as well.
Not under linux. Are you sure?
Hmm, that was changed then and the compiler was fixed; probably due to me
mentioning
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:10:55 +0100
Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:01:11 +0100
Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, that was changed then and the compiler was fixed; probably due to me
mentioning it on IRC sometime ago, also :-). The name has 'alloc'
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:10:55 +0100
Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:01:11 +0100
Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, that was changed then and the compiler was fixed; probably due to me
mentioning
On 8 mrt 2006, at 20:34, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What has 'alloc' to do with cleaning/zeroing?
It is *the* difference between GetMem and AllocMem.
Not in FPC. Reallocmem just resizes. No zeroing is done, as already
explained
by Jonas and Daniel.
Yes, but allocmem() does zero the
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 8 mrt 2006, at 20:34, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
What has 'alloc' to do with cleaning/zeroing?
It is *the* difference between GetMem and AllocMem.
Not in FPC. Reallocmem just resizes. No zeroing is done, as already
explained
by Jonas
11 matches
Mail list logo
