013 1:18 PM
To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
On 19.02.2013 18:05, Boian Mitov wrote:
No, FPC does currently not support anonymous functions (please don't
call them Lambdas... at least not with that verbose syntax ;) ). We have
a branch where an independant dev
On 19.02.2013 18:05, Boian Mitov wrote:
I think they (FPC) have added their own implementation. Haven’t looked
in more details, but saw some code posted, and I think they had a
different implementation than Emb., using the lambda keyword.
In any case at some point it will have to be adopted one w
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
From: Kostas Michalopoulos
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:36 AM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
AFAIK FPC doesn't support la
ace we use the new RTTI ;-)
>
>
> With best regards,
> Boian Mitov
>
> --**-
> Mitov Software
> www.mitov.com
> --------------**-----
> -Original Message- From: Boian Mitov
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:49 A
Mitov
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
-Original Message-
From: Boian Mitov
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:49 AM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
H
On 18.02.2013 20:49, Boian Mitov wrote:
Hi Sven,
It is an abstraction API that on the low side is 100% compatible with
the Delphi API, as it uses it to access the information, but on the user
side presents extremely easy to use API. It is probably better than
anything available in the world
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo M. Ramé
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:39 AM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
Hi Boian, did you ha
---
-Original Message-
From: Sven Barth
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:37 AM
To: fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
On 18.02.2013 20:30, Boian Mitov wrote:
How compatible to Delphi's A
On 18.02.2013 18:04, Maciej Izak wrote:
Can I help?
The generation of the extended RTTI data is currently missing which
needs corresponding knowledge in the compiler. And I'm also waiting for
the finishing of the attributes implementation which will pave some way
for the extended RTTI data.
>
> From: Boian Mitov
>To: FPC developers' list
>Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] State of extended RTTI
>
> Hi All,
>
>We have developed an advanced RTTI API that replaces the Embarcadero R
On 18.02.2013 20:30, Boian Mitov wrote:
Hi All,
We have developed an advanced RTTI API that replaces the Embarcadero
RTTI API and provides much more powerful and easy to use when accessing
the RTTI.
We developed it as we ware running into huge number of issues and bugs
when trying to use the
,
Boian Mitov
---
Mitov Software
www.mitov.com
---
-Original Message-
From: Maciej Izak
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 9:04 AM
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel]
Can I help?
Info about good implementation of TValue -
http://www.cromis.net/blog/2013/02/tanyvalue-an-attempt-to-make-the-best-variable-data-container/
Has FPC some equivalent of invoke from rtti.pas (dynamically invoking
a methods and procedures/functions)? If not - I have my own basic
implement
On 10.02.2013 14:19, Maciej Izak wrote:
Hi,
What is the state of Extended RTTI (like in Delphi 2010 and up)?
You can read in the comment by Sven
"One of the developers has started to implement class attributes and
I’m rather sure that the enhanced RTTI will come sooner or later as
well"
http:/
Hi,
What is the state of Extended RTTI (like in Delphi 2010 and up)?
You can read in the comment by Sven
"One of the developers has started to implement class attributes and
I’m rather sure that the enhanced RTTI will come sooner or later as
well"
http://www.deltics.co.nz/blog/?p=1129
How's he
15 matches
Mail list logo
