Date sent: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:14:53 +0200
From: Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ;
> Tomas Hajny wrote:
>
Tomas Hajny wrote:
> Date sent:Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST)
> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ;
> From: "Peter Vreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "FPC developers' list"
&
Date sent: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:46:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject:Re: [fpc-devel] Strange behaviour of ;
From: "Peter Vreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Send reply to: FPC de
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>
>> I can confirm this on linux-i386 2.0.0 and darwin-ppc 2.0.1
>>
>> It looks like "+ " is parsed wrong. The next "program"
>> compiles fine.
>
> Well, the compiler/parser thinks you use the unary + operator which it can
> safely throw away :) IIRC TP accepted the unary + o
Marc Weustink wrote:
> I can confirm this on linux-i386 2.0.0 and darwin-ppc 2.0.1
>
> It looks like "+ " is parsed wrong. The next "program"
> compiles fine.
Well, the compiler/parser thinks you use the unary + operator which it can
safely throw away :) IIRC TP accepted the unary + operator for
I can confirm this on linux-i386 2.0.0 and darwin-ppc 2.0.1
It looks like "+ " is parsed wrong. The next "program"
compiles fine.
Marc
program testplus;
{$mode objfpc} {$H+}
begin
+ ParamStr(0);
+ ParamCount;
+ Exit;
+ WriteLN;
end.
Alexander Todorov wrote:
Hi all,
i have noticed
Hi all,
i have noticed something strange and I am not sure if this is a bug or
a feature.
strSQL := Copy(strSQL,1,Length(strSQL)-1) + ' WHERE ';
strSQL := strSQL ; + ConstructWhereClause;
--^
This part of code must construct a sql sttement which is
