Reminder, reported as http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=12984
Best regards.
--
Inoussa O.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi,
A discussion started a month or two ago about the thread safety issue
concerning XML DOM, issue due to avl_tree.pp implementation.
There were 3 propositions :
1 - Inoussa OUEDRAOGO :
Another proposition is to introduce a base avl class say TBaseAVLTree
that defines two
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:48:22 +0100
Inoussa OUEDRAOGO inouss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A discussion started a month or two ago about the thread safety issue
concerning XML DOM, issue due to avl_tree.pp implementation.
There were 3 propositions :
1 - Inoussa OUEDRAOGO :
Another
No matter what solution will be choosed, a thread-safe implementation
of AVL tree is a must, IMHO.
Yes.
1+2 sounds compatible.
Will you provide a patch?
Yes :-)
--
Inoussa O.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
