On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, José Mejuto wrote:
El 04/09/2016 a las 14:04, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
The second powerful reason is that I was not aware about TBufStream :)
It's even documented.
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/fcl/bufstream/index.html
Hello,
Sure :) But I'm not
El 04/09/2016 a las 14:04, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
The second powerful reason is that I was not aware about TBufStream :)
It's even documented.
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/fcl/bufstream/index.html
Hello,
Sure :) But I'm not aware about all the gems in fpc code :)
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, José Mejuto wrote:
El 04/09/2016 a las 7:15, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
In the other hand a cache system is powerful than a buffered system if
you are writing something like a filesystem over a TFileStream where
you may need to jump here and there to read data, file
El 04/09/2016 a las 7:15, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
In the other hand a cache system is powerful than a buffered system if
you are writing something like a filesystem over a TFileStream where
you may need to jump here and there to read data, file allocation
tables, attributes, and so on, in
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, José Mejuto wrote:
El 03/09/2016 a las 22:15, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
Added to the bugtracker implementation of TBufferedFileStream, there
is one compatibility issue note in the bug entry.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30549
Nice. I have assigned this
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:58 PM, silvioprog wrote:
[...]
> ... under compressed files ...
>
Sorry, I meant "within compressed files".
--
Silvio Clécio
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 9:39 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
> El 04/09/2016 a las 2:04, silvioprog escribió:
>
> If I understood right, did you create something like GIO or GVFS? Or
>> neither of them hehe
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> Yes and no :) It's something like GVFS but at your program
El 04/09/2016 a las 2:04, silvioprog escribió:
If I understood right, did you create something like GIO or GVFS? Or
neither of them hehe
Hello,
Yes and no :) It's something like GVFS but at your program level only. I
originally develop it to be used in a forensic tool (which was not
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 8:20 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
> El 04/09/2016 a las 0:23, silvioprog escribió:
>
> --
>> CACHE 100 byte sequential reads in 46 ms.
>> FILE 100 byte sequential reads in 2200 ms.
>>
El 04/09/2016 a las 0:23, silvioprog escribió:
--
CACHE 100 byte sequential reads in 46 ms.
FILE 100 byte sequential reads in 2200 ms.
--
[...]
Did you get this result from some
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
[...]
> ... Typical example is TFileStream.GetByte which I'm using in a parser,
> because the file could be very big, and I don't want to read everything in
> a TMemoryStream, performance of cache/buffered and regular is
El 03/09/2016 a las 22:15, Michael Van Canneyt escribió:
Added to the bugtracker implementation of TBufferedFileStream, there
is one compatibility issue note in the bug entry.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30549
Nice. I have assigned this to myself.
Out of curiosity:
Why do you
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, José Mejuto wrote:
Hello,
Added to the bugtracker implementation of TBufferedFileStream, there is one
compatibility issue note in the bug entry.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30549
Nice. I have assigned this to myself.
Out of curiosity:
Why do you think
Hello,
Added to the bugtracker implementation of TBufferedFileStream, there is
one compatibility issue note in the bug entry.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30549
--
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
14 matches
Mail list logo