On 03/12/12 01:19, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> message is sufficient. But a check for a third "<" definitely should be
> added to the scanner, so that a more specific error message can be issued.
Not worth the effort, in my opinion. I understood the error message
immediately.
Henry
___
Mark Morgan Lloyd schrieb:
What error message do you expect?
Something that recognises that a message like <<< .mine originates
from the project's chosen VCS, and that <<< is distinct from shl.
+1
A concatenation of the *binary* "<" or "<<" operators, into "...",
doesn't mak
On 02.12.2012 17:11, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
On 02.12.2012 13:11, Henry Vermaak wrote:
Yes, "<<" and ">>" are converted in scanner stage to "shl" and "shr" which
will give me headaches once I want to support nested specializations
(basically the
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 02.12.2012 13:11, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> Yes, "<<" and ">>" are converted in scanner stage to "shl" and "shr" which
> will give me headaches once I want to support nested specializations
> (basically the same problem that C++ had):
>
> TTest>
On 02.12.2012 13:11, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On Dec 2, 2012 11:47 AM, "Mark Morgan Lloyd"
mailto:markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> I've just had a slight problem compiling Lazarus where FPC was
reporting this:
>
> main.pp(5001,1) Fatal: Syntax error, "BEGIN" expected but "shl" foun
On 02.12.2012 15:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:46:54 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've just had a slight problem compiling Lazarus where FPC was
reporting this:
main.pp(5001,1) Fatal: Syntax error, "BEGIN" expected but "shl" found
The reason w
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:46:54 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've just had a slight problem compiling Lazarus where FPC was reporting
this:
main.pp(5001,1) Fatal: Syntax error, "BEGIN" expected but "shl" found
The reason was that I'd not spotted that Subversion had in
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:46:54 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> I've just had a slight problem compiling Lazarus where FPC was reporting
> this:
>
> main.pp(5001,1) Fatal: Syntax error, "BEGIN" expected but "shl" found
>
> The reason was that I'd not spotted that Subversion had inserted a like l
On Dec 2, 2012 11:47 AM, "Mark Morgan Lloyd" <
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I've just had a slight problem compiling Lazarus where FPC was reporting
this:
>
> main.pp(5001,1) Fatal: Syntax error, "BEGIN" expected but "shl" found
>
<< is shl in c. I guess fpc accepts this syntax, t
I've just had a slight problem compiling Lazarus where FPC was reporting
this:
main.pp(5001,1) Fatal: Syntax error, "BEGIN" expected but "shl" found
The reason was that I'd not spotted that Subversion had inserted a like like
< Mine:
preceding a function. Is this something that the compil
10 matches
Mail list logo
