> -Message d'origine-
> De : fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org
> [mailto:fpc-devel-boun...@lists.freepascal.org] De la part de
> Marco van de Voort
> Envoyé : samedi 19 mai 2012 20:33
> À : FPC developers' list
> Objet : Re: RE : [fpc-devel]
In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said:
>
> I'm in the middle of adding the unicode versions in the header translation.
> That's why I'm asking.
Start small, by submitting small pieces. Usually insights progress as we go,
and exceptions to the original perceived rules are discovered ;)
___
>
> No. There is UNICODE, but that only covers some recent
> additions. And most of the database systems are loadlibrary
> style anyway.
>
> The bulk of the header applications were simply done without
> it.
I'm in the middle of adding the unicode versions in the header translation.
That's w
In our previous episode, Ludo Brands said:
> I'm looking into adding unicode support for odbconnection. Although the
> unixodbc and iodbc drivers also support the W versions of the API I would
> prefer to include the W versions with a define. Is there already a global
> define to select unicode api
Hi,
I'm looking into adding unicode support for odbconnection. Although the
unixodbc and iodbc drivers also support the W versions of the API I would
prefer to include the W versions with a define. Is there already a global
define to select unicode api's? Or is this going to be managed on a per
un
