On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Marcos Douglas B. Santos
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:29 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>
> If a program isn't long running I see programmers tend to not care
> about memory management, nor do I make a ha
On 07/30/2018 11:35 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, R0b0t1 wrote:
It might be hard to imagine FPC taking that much longer than it does
currently but ~30min for a large program is the standard with other
compilers. I very much enjoy the speed of FPC. >
30 *Minutes*, is this
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Marcos Douglas B. Santos
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:29 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Martok wrote:
>>> Am 30.07.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Marcos Douglas B. Santos:
Is performance more important than being correct? :|
>>> In thi
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:29 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Martok wrote:
>> Am 30.07.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Marcos Douglas B. Santos:
>>> Is performance more important than being correct? :|
>> In this project, the answer is always taken to be yes.
>>
>
> To hopefully offe
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
>
>> Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Mo., 30. Juli
>> 2018,
>> 15:30:
>>
>>> Obviously provided you don't install another mechanism that does this and
>>> don't raise exceptions
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Martok wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 30.07.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Marcos Douglas B. Santos:
Is performance more important than being correct? :|
>>>
>>> In thi
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, R0b0t1 wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Martok wrote:
Am 30.07.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Marcos Douglas B. Santos:
Is performance more important than being correct? :|
In this project, the answer is always taken to be yes.
To hopefully offer some explanation for
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Martok wrote:
> Am 30.07.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Marcos Douglas B. Santos:
>> Is performance more important than being correct? :|
> In this project, the answer is always taken to be yes.
>
To hopefully offer some explanation for Mr. Santos - if I can compile
and r
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Mo., 30. Juli 2018,
15:30:
Obviously provided you don't install another mechanism that does this and
don't raise exceptions manually, which - AFAIK - is the case in the
compiler...
The compiler does use e
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb am Mo., 30. Juli 2018,
15:30:
> Obviously provided you don't install another mechanism that does this and
> don't raise exceptions manually, which - AFAIK - is the case in the
> compiler...
>
The compiler does use exceptions when the compilation needs to be aborted
e.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
[...]
Many people will probably be surprised, but the use of try/finally
is not required for an application:
Gradually, some parts of the compiler were switched to classes, b
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>[...]
> Many people will probably be surprised, but the use of try/finally
> is not required for an application:
>
> Gradually, some parts of the compiler were switched to classes, but even
> then, without exceptions: As long
From: fpc-devel On Behalf Of Marcos
Douglas B. Santos
Sent: Monday, 30 July 2018 22:25
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Why/how does the compiler have a non-trivial number
ofmemory leaks after over two decades of development?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Sven Bart
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
J. Gareth Moreton schrieb am Mo., 30. Juli
2018, 13:31:
I've noticed that the compiler doesn't use
try...finally blocks to help with free
Am 30.07.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Marcos Douglas B. Santos:
> Is performance more important than being correct? :|
In this project, the answer is always taken to be yes.
--
Regards,
Martok
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http:/
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> wrote:
> J. Gareth Moreton schrieb am Mo., 30. Juli
> 2018, 13:31:
>
>> I've noticed that the compiler doesn't use
>> try...finally blocks to help with freeing
>> blocks. I'm not sure why this is the case,
J. Gareth Moreton schrieb am Mo., 30. Juli
2018, 13:31:
> I've noticed that the compiler doesn't use
> try...finally blocks to help with freeing
> blocks. I'm not sure why this is the case,
> but might be speed related.
>
Correct. Even implicit try-finally frame generation is disabled for the
co
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, J. Gareth Moreton wrote:
On Mon 30/07/18 01:58 , Ben Grasset
operato...@gmail.com sent:
I was even able to successfully actually
fix some of the leaks, but others
boiled down to a "node" being created as
a local variable in the middle of
some 1000+ line method, gett
On Mon 30/07/18 01:58 , Ben Grasset
operato...@gmail.com sent:
> I was even able to successfully actually
fix some of the leaks, but others
> boiled down to a "node" being created as
a local variable in the middle of
> some 1000+ line method, getting assigned
to the "left" or "right" property
19 matches
Mail list logo
