On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Vincent Snijders
vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote:
Well, there is still is:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/ctypes/csize_t.html
The docs could be out-dated, csize_t doesn't compile in FPC
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
The descriptions is completely wrong.
Please post a bugreport.
Done:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14932
Vincnet
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
The descriptions is completely wrong.
Please post a bugreport.
Done:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=14932
Vincnet
Thank you, Vincnet :-)
Michael.
___
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef:
Hello,
In the past there was a csize_t which I used in the imagemagick
headers, but now it seams to have disappeared. Is size_t compatible
with the c type? Or else any other compatible type to use?
Well, there is still is:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Vincent Snijders
vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote:
Well, there is still is:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/ctypes/csize_t.html
The docs could be out-dated, csize_t doesn't compile in FPC 2.2.4
I think the description is a bit strange: Character
Ah, it's the oposite, sorry, csize_t was *added* and someone updated
the imagemagick headers ...
I was testing the svn imagemagick headers with the stable compiler ...
ok, problem solved.
thanks for the help Vincent,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Vincent Snijders
vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote:
Well, there is still is:
http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/fpcdoc/rtl/ctypes/csize_t.html
The docs could be out-dated, csize_t doesn't compile in FPC 2.2.4
Or maybe too
2009/10/28 Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl:
I think the description is a bit strange: Character size type. I
wouldhave
guess the c was not because of Character, but because of the C language.
The descriptions is completely wrong.
Michael, do you need a bug report?
Originally
