In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > 2) Also the section number is a bit odd. "0.1" - but that's not really a
> > biggy. Maybe the section number could be left out like was done in the
> > ref.xxx document.
> >
> > It's all about consistency. ;-)
>
> I'll have a look at this.
No
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm not picking on you, I promise! :-) I'm just doing my bit evaluating
the upcoming FPC 2.4 release - code & docs.
Too late, the intercontinental ballistic missile has left
---[ ref.xxx ]---
1) In the current re
Hi Michael,
I'm not picking on you, I promise! :-) I'm just doing my bit evaluating
the upcoming FPC 2.4 release - code & docs.
---[ ref.xxx ]---
1) In the current ref.ps & ref.pdf documents, page 6 doesn't contain a
header, where all pages before and after it has got headers (which
