Done as
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13965
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Op woensdag 10-06-2009 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef ABorka:
Adding fcgi-support was only two hours work. Other systems can be added
> as wel. Next on my list is a native web-server using lnet, so that
If the "custom" variants need to stay then the descriptions for each
must state exactly what is the difference between the custom and not
custom and when they should be used.
Currently, anyone who is not an FPC/Lazarus professional developer
already, cannot decide based on the description.
I d
Joost van der Sluis schreef:
3. Simple CGI application should be removed since it is deprecated
Hmm.. maybe. The new components are really better now.
But require fpc 2.3.1? Or are they really better with fpc 2.2.4 too.
Vincent
___
fpc-devel mail
Op donderdag 11-06-2009 om 13:39 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef BoBo:
> Well, this is just my opinion - maybe others could say something too -
> but I think it would clear up things a bit if we do the following things:
>
> 1. I think all the "Custom" variations should be removed it just
> confuse
Well, this is just my opinion - maybe others could say something too -
but I think it would clear up things a bit if we do the following things:
1. I think all the "Custom" variations should be removed it just
confuses new arrival people.
Any pro will know how to make those anyway.
Or make the
Op woensdag 10-06-2009 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef ABorka:
> > Adding fcgi-support was only two hours work. Other systems can be added
> > as wel. Next on my list is a native web-server using lnet, so that
> > debugging is even easier. (I'm absolutely sure that posting all messages
>
ABorka schreef:
BTW, there should be some explanation in Lazarus -> File -> New for
people about the differences between
Application - Program - Custom Program ;
I think the description in the Project -> New ... explains the
differences clear enough.
If not, what are you missing?
Vincent
> Adding fcgi-support was only two hours work. Other systems can be added
> as wel. Next on my list is a native web-server using lnet, so that
> debugging is even easier. (I'm absolutely sure that posting all messages
> about fcl-web not supportinf fcgi was more work then actually adding the
> sup
