On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 12:03 AM Tomas Hajny wrote:
> In any case, _if_ doing it, I would do it by adding -Fu and -Fi pointing
> to the upper (i.e. compiler) directory to the Makefile rule for building
> the fpc executable, adding a possibility to pass the version information
> from fpc to the res
On Thu, January 3, 2019 23:01, Bart wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 7:06 PM Tomas Hajny wrote:
.
.
>> Obviously, it might be changed if needed. The question is if people
>> really want such a warning.
>
> Probably not, since I'm the first one to raise this ;-)
That was indeed my thought as well
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 7:06 PM Tomas Hajny wrote:
> By design or not, the fpc executable holds no version information as of
> now, IIRC.
OK.
> Obviously, it might be changed if needed. The question is if people really
> want such a warning.
Probably not, since I'm the first one to raise this ;
On Thu, January 3, 2019 18:46, Bart wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:36 PM Florian Klämpfl
> wrote:
>
>> The fpc executable has not to match with the real compiler executable.
>
> By design?
> I find that a bit odd.
By design or not, the fpc executable holds no version information as of
now, IIR
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 6:36 PM Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> The fpc executable has not to match with the real compiler executable.
By design?
I find that a bit odd.
--
Bart
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal
Am 03.01.19 um 18:22 schrieb Bart:
Hi,
All of this is of course of my own doing but is it expected?
I built and installed fpc trunk, just the 32-bit version.
I have 3.0.4 32-bit, and for that release I also have the win32-win64
cross-compiler installed.
Having forgotten that I did not build th
Hi,
All of this is of course of my own doing but is it expected?
I built and installed fpc trunk, just the 32-bit version.
I have 3.0.4 32-bit, and for that release I also have the win32-win64
cross-compiler installed.
Having forgotten that I did not build the win32-win64 cross-compiler
from tru
