Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

Ah, okay. On 25/07/2020 23:00, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote: J. Gareth Moreton > schrieb am Sa., 25. Juli 2020, 22:24: Since 3.2.0 has already had a public release, should the version number be incremented to 3.2.1 or some such? The version of

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

J. Gareth Moreton schrieb am Sa., 25. Juli 2020, 22:24: > Since 3.2.0 has already had a public release, should the version number > be incremented to 3.2.1 or some such? > The version of the fixes branch already *is* 3.2.1 since 20th June (

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

Since 3.2.0 has already had a public release, should the version number be incremented to 3.2.1 or some such? Gareth aka. Kit On 25/07/2020 21:19, Marco van de Voort wrote: Op 2020-07-25 om 21:51 schreef Benito van der Zander: I looked in my repo, and they are in the list of regexpr fixes

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

Op 2020-07-25 om 21:51 schreef Benito van der Zander: I looked in my repo, and they are in the list of regexpr fixes to merge. http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs32/regexr.html If Michael "Ok"s them, I'll merge them/. ___ fpc-devel maillist -

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

and: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36603 a regression when passing empty strings to regexpr perhaps its follow-up: https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36701 On 25.07.20 16:26, Martin wrote: Could the fix for issue https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36017 be merged to

[fpc-devel] Merge request for 3.2 fixes

Could the fix for issue https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36017 be merged to fixes branch please? Unfortunately I missed that it wasn't merged before the release (I had it commented out in my tests, so I could see if anything else would break). But it would be nice to have it for 3.2.2.

[fpc-devel] Merge request of rev. 18141 to FPC 2.6.x

Hello. I would like to request merging rev. 18141 from trunk to 2.6.x branch. It seems a simple fix. FPC 2.6.0 hangs when compiling some of our code. http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=18141 http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19864 In the bug report it says fixed

[fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

Hello, Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of all changes from fpvectorial since the branching. http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log thanks, -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of all changes from fpvectorial since the branching. http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log There are only two, 18977,

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote: There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed. Yes, but the last one breaks backwards compatibility, so I though that it would be better if people already use the new layout. Plus it also changes the

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote: There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed. ( http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/ and then fpvectorial ) Yes, but the last one breaks

[fpc-devel] merge request

Hi, I get a compilation error in the compiler when creating a win32 to arm-wince crosscompiler with fpc 2.5.1: cgcpu.pas(2087,88) Error: Identifier not found pasbool Can http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/branches/pasboolxx/compiler/arm/cgcpu.pas?r1=17847r2=17846pathrev=17847 be

[fpc-devel] Merge request

Hi, Please merge the fix for Mantis 10825 (Memory error in fpc_WideStr_Concat_multi) to fixes_2_2. Thanks, Martin ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request

Martin Schreiber schrieb: Hi, Please merge the fix for Mantis 10825 (Memory error in fpc_WideStr_Concat_multi) to fixes_2_2. Merged. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] merge request for 9342

Vincent Snijders schreef: Can revision 9342 (Allow using constants in {$IF } directive in OBJFPC mode) be merged to the fixes 2.2 branch? http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=9342 Since there were no objections, I merged it in r9714. Vincent

Re: [fpc-devel] merge request for 9342

Vincent Snijders ha scritto: Can revision 9342 (Allow using constants in {$IF } directive in OBJFPC mode) be merged to the fixes 2.2 branch? http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=9342 I can't see anything against, now. Maybe I'll have obejctions once the patch is

Re: [fpc-devel] merge request for 9342

Vincent Snijders ha scritto: Can revision 9342 (Allow using constants in {$IF } directive in OBJFPC mode) be merged to the fixes 2.2 branch? http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=9342 Sorry, I replied thinking you were referring to Lazarus-dev. Mail filter put the

Re: [fpc-devel] merge request for typo in gdkfunction enum

From: Marc Weustink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, Is it possible to merge 7311 into fixes ? Merged. Yury. ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

[fpc-devel] merge request for typo in gdkfunction enum

Hi, Is it possible to merge 7311 into fixes ? Marc ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel