Florian Klaempfl wrote:
If you want to modernize the language you can take the current fpc
code and extend it yourself. If the extension is clear and we agree on
it it can eventually be put in the main fpc release.
Discussions are useful.
Discussions without proper basics are useless. If you
listmember wrote:
>> If you want to modernize the language you can take the current fpc
>> code and extend it yourself. If the extension is clear and we agree on
>> it it can eventually be put in the main fpc release.
>
>
> Discussions are useful.
Discussions without proper basics are useless.
If you want to modernize the language you can take the current fpc code
and extend it yourself. If the extension is clear and we agree on it it
can eventually be put in the main fpc release.
Discussions are useful.
Before one starts coding away, a consensus would be nice to have.
I would not
I think we should put these kind of threads to an end. We get several
different request which conflict or need a lot of time:
- Packages
- Better optimizer
- Better smartlinking (internal linker) to reduce executable size
- Easier cross platform (internal linker/assemblers)
- Faster (C++ like) e