Ok, then. We have consensus to remove the deps.
I will submit a patch later today.
Darius
>
>
> Op Tue, 12 Jun 2007, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> The patch needs some reconsideration.
>>
>> zip.pas (perhaps other units I added also?) have a dependency on zlib.
>> But
>> zlib is in packages/ex
Op Tue, 12 Jun 2007, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The patch needs some reconsideration.
>
> zip.pas (perhaps other units I added also?) have a dependency on zlib. But
> zlib is in packages/extra and not packages/base like paszlib. Does that
> mean that zip.pas cannot reside at base/paszlib? Pro
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The patch needs some reconsideration.
>
> zip.pas (perhaps other units I added also?) have a dependency on zlib. But
> zlib is in packages/extra and not packages/base like paszlib. Does that
> mean that zip.pas cannot reside at base/paszlib? Proba
The patch needs some reconsideration.
zip.pas (perhaps other units I added also?) have a dependency on zlib. But
zlib is in packages/extra and not packages/base like paszlib. Does that
mean that zip.pas cannot reside at base/paszlib? Probably yes, unless I
remove the dep (if possible). Or should I
