At 13:44 17-4-2006, you wrote:
> >I don't understand the way FPC stores debug information: line info
etc. It
> >seems useful to not lose this information or at least know, that it was
> >overwritten.
> >I got some run time errors with no line info (when compiled with -gcl
> >option), all of them
> >I don't understand the way FPC stores debug information: line info etc. It
> >seems useful to not lose this information or at least know, that it was
> >overwritten.
> >I got some run time errors with no line info (when compiled with -gcl
> >option), all of them should be "unreproducible", be
At 11:59 17-4-2006, you wrote:
Sometimes RTL dataspace, including run time error numbers (may be some
debug information), is corrupted because of poor programming. It's a
reason for getting strange messages like "Run time error 998" (may be
omitting line number information etc).
FPC has imple
Sometimes RTL dataspace, including run time error numbers (may be some debug
information), is corrupted because of poor programming. It's a reason for
getting strange messages like "Run time error 998" (may be omitting line number
information etc).
FPC has implemented e.g. some checks for point
