From: "Balogh, Karoly (Charlie/iNQ)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [fpc-devel]Re: some m68k releated stuff
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailt
Hi,
On 2003-04-05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 13.Work:Develop/FPC/fixes/fpc/compiler> make compiler OS_TARGET=amiga
>> CPU_TARGET=m68k make: -iVSPTPSOTO: Command not found make: -iSP:
>> Command not found make: -iTP: Command not found make: -iSO: Command
>
> do you have "fpc" available on PATH
Hi,
On 2003-04-03, Carl Eric Codere wrote:
> Forget about sing make under AmigaOS, the problem with the ported
> version of GNU tools as they mimic UNIX too much, so paths, and
> everything else must be run in ksh, but by doing that, FPC no longer
> recgnizes Amiga paths and filenames...
Hehe,
Hi,
On 2003-04-03, Peter Vreman wrote:
> You can also try "make FPC=ppc68k" to force the use of ppc68k
Yes, this solved the problem, i was finally able to build a
compiler... Still not to cycle though, but i'm satisfied
with the current result. It is possible to modify the makefile
to automagic
From: "Balogh, Karoly (Charlie/iNQ)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [fpc-devel]Re: some m68k releated stuff
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailt
>>
>>Yes i did. The filenames are all lowercase. But anyway, the Amiga
>>filesystem doesn't case sensitive...
>
>Also if the filesystem isn't case sensitive, make itself can be case
>sensetive. For example the mingw32 make.exe.
>
>Maybe the file extension that is added for executables is not corre
> Hi,
>
> On 2003-04-02, Peter Vreman wrote:
>
>> Maybe the file extension that is added for executables is not correct or
>> the environment variable PATH is not available.
>
> Hmmm... Yes, this was the problem. It seems that the Amiga version of GNU
> tools doesn't use the internal AmigaOS path,
Hi,
On 2003-04-02, Peter Vreman wrote:
> Maybe the file extension that is added for executables is not correct or
> the environment variable PATH is not available.
Hmmm... Yes, this was the problem. It seems that the Amiga version of GNU
tools doesn't use the internal AmigaOS path, but require
At 12:08 2-4-2003, you wrote:
Hi,
On 2003-04-01, Peter Vreman wrote:
10.Work:Develop/FPC/fixes/fpc/compiler> make compiler
Makefile:17: *** You need the GNU utils package to use
this Makefile.
Stop.
Ideas? :) I'll take a look again on my GNU utils stuff,
but i think
Hi,
On 2003-04-01, Peter Vreman wrote:
10.Work:Develop/FPC/fixes/fpc/compiler> make compiler
Makefile:17: *** You need the GNU utils package to use
this Makefile.
Stop.
Ideas? :) I'll take a look again on my GNU utils stuff,
but i think everything is available, and o
>>> 10.Work:Develop/FPC/fixes/fpc/compiler> make compiler
>>> Makefile:17: *** You need the GNU utils package to use
>>> this Makefile.
>>> Stop.
>>> Ideas? :) I'll take a look again on my GNU utils stuff,
>>> but i think everything is available, and on the path...
>> starting "make fpc_info" might
Hi,
On 2003-03-31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 10.Work:Develop/FPC/fixes/fpc/compiler> make compiler
>> Makefile:17: *** You need the GNU utils package to use
>> this Makefile.
>> Stop.
>> Ideas? :) I'll take a look again on my GNU utils stuff,
>> but i think everything is available, and on the
Hi,
On 2003-03-28, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> I can vaguely remember something about the 040 not having a few FPU
> instructions the 030 has, maybe that also goes for 060's.
The 030 doesn't have any internal FPU. You most probably think about
the '881/882 FPU. :) But yes, the 040/060 FPU only s
Hi,
On 2003-03-28, Pierre Muller wrote:
>> Here are a few things about the m68k version i'd like to discuss.
>> First, how well the FPU codegenerator is tested in the m68k version?
>> [...] So, are there any known defects of the FPU code generator, or
>> should i try to give a small example pr
14 matches
Mail list logo
