Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-26 Thread Tomas Hajny
Vinzent Hoefler said: > On Wednesday 25 May 2005 14:51, Tomas Hajny wrote: . . >> recommend starting with this part (for building the compiler at least >> - Win2K etc. provide better error checking mechanisms, so e.g. >> SIGSEGVs can be completely undetected under W9x, whereas W2K shows >> them i

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-26 Thread Lee, John
ddly in win 9x... Regards John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vinzent Hoefler Sent: 26 May 2005 14:50 To: FPC developers' list Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms On Wednesday 25 May 2005 13:12, Lee, John wrote: > Just put a v

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-26 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 12:50, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Our policy is to work and develop patches in the 2.1.x branch. As > soon as they work, we merge them back to 2.0.x using the mechanisms > of svn. But patches against 2.0.x are ok as well because I don't > think that currently much people ar

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-26 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 13:12, Lee, John wrote: > Just put a v2.1.1 basedos.zip (compiler & rtl only) snapshot which I > just made on win me, using supplied makes into ftp.freepascal.org > .../snapshot/v21/. Used .../snapshot/v21/source/ . Not tested much, > but it works for hello world program a

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-26 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 14:51, Tomas Hajny wrote: > First of all - make sure you don't use Win32 versions of the GNU > tools (especially make.exe etc.) when trying to build for the GO32v2 > target under WinXX. The best is to change your PATH setting within > the given session. Then the existing m

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-25 Thread Tomas Hajny
Vinzent Hoefler said: > Ok, first status on the matter: > > Tonight I've spent some time with the sources and my Win2K machine. For > me it seems as the Makefile(.fpc)'s are not yet up to date for the > go32v2 target (object files didn't get deleted on cleanall, some unit > paths were missing, that

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-25 Thread Lee, John
sage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lee, John Sent: 25 May 2005 13:48 To: FPC developers' list Subject: RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms I've never been able to make go32v2 make work properly under w2k/xp, and neither has anyone else afaik - because of the well kn

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-25 Thread Lee, John
rds John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vinzent Hoefler Sent: 25 May 2005 13:03 To: FPC developers' list Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms Ok, first status on the matter: Tonight I've spent some time with the sources and my

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-25 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > > Oh, yes. One question: Should I use the current fpc2.0.1 release from > the CVS or would it be better to switch to the 2.1.x branch already to > not get too far behind the current development? Just don't say > "both". ;-) Our policy is to work and develop patches in

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-25 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
Ok, first status on the matter: Tonight I've spent some time with the sources and my Win2K machine. For me it seems as the Makefile(.fpc)'s are not yet up to date for the go32v2 target (object files didn't get deleted on cleanall, some unit paths were missing, that sort of stuff) [FYI: I checke

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Lee, John
I can help on doing dos makes eg under win9x - I do them every day for dos snapshots. Regards John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniël Mantione Sent: 23 May 2005 19:03 To: FPC developers' list Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Plat

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Mon, 23 May 2005, schreef Vinzent Hoefler: > On Monday 23 May 2005 09:25, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > > > > > Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be > > > more specific: what is known to need high priority wor

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Monday 23 May 2005 09:25, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > > > Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be > > more specific: what is known to need high priority work to get the > > most basic stuff of a DOS-Compiler working

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Tomas Hajny
Peter Vreman said: >> Vinzent Hoefler wrote: >> >There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that >steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 there will be no DOS >release anymore. . . >>> Alright. How much time would someone need for that task? Or, to be more >>> sp

RE: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Lee, John
I hope to start the go32v2 & win32 daily snapshots in next day or so for v2.0 & v2.1 John > > > > Crashes with the dos extender, probably exception related, > see also the > > go32v2 > > related bug reports. First step: get the 1.0.10 go32v2 > compiler and try a > > make > > all with the 2.0.x

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Peter Vreman
> Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > >> On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: >> >> At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: >What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? >Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that steps for

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > >>>At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: >>> What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? >>> >>>There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that >>>steps forward to be

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Marco van de Voort
> On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > > > steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 there will be no DOS > > > release anymore. > > > > To amend this - we're certainly willing to support such a volunteer > > to reasonable extent, but we just don't have sufficient bandwidth for

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-23 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Sunday 22 May 2005 10:17, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: > > >What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? > > >Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? > > > > There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that > > steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 ther

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:03:37 +0200 To: Ivan Shikhalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "FPC developers' list" From: Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms > At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: > >What's about Go32v2 or som

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-22 Thread Tomas Hajny
Date sent: Sun, 22 May 2005 12:03:37 +0200 To: Ivan Shikhalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "FPC developers' list" From: Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms Copies to:

Re: [fpc-devel] DOS Platforms

2005-05-22 Thread Peter Vreman
At 11:46 22-5-2005, you wrote: What's about Go32v2 or some other DOS port? Will it supported in 2.0.x branch? There is no maintainer for go32v2. Unless there is an user that steps forward to be the maintainer for go32v2 there will be no DOS release anymore. Peter _