On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Jason P Sage wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Does the IPC unit written for linux by Michael Van Canneyt now support other
> platforms?
It supports windows as well. Since day 1, I might add.
Michael.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@
> Does the IPC unit written for linux by Michael Van Canneyt now support other
> platforms?
Yes, since 2.0 it supports FreeBSD and some tests with OS X were also done
(a handful of functions isn't implemented on OS X, see interface), using the
documentation examples.
However it is a bit sensitive
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Jason P Sage wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Does the IPC unit written for linux by Michael Van Canneyt now support other
> > platforms?
>
> It supports windows as well. Since day 1, I might add.
I only see an implementation on unit ipc in the rtl/unix directory.
___
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Jason P Sage wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Does the IPC unit written for linux by Michael Van Canneyt now support
> > > other
> > > platforms?
> >
> > It supports windows as well. Since day 1, I might add.
>
>
> > > > Does the IPC unit written for linux by Michael Van Canneyt now
support other
> > > > platforms?
> > >
> > > It supports windows as well. Since day 1, I might add.
> >
> > I only see an implementation on unit ipc in the rtl/unix directory.
>
> He means simpleipc in the fcl, I assume ?
>
>
Why not use TCP/IP to send informations from one program to another ? In
Linux this should perform at least as well as anything else, in Windows
named pipes or windows messages with "attached" shared memory blocks
might perform better.
Moreover you now easily can split the application between
Michael Schnell Wrote:
>Why not use TCP/IP to send informations from one program to another ?
In
>Linux this should perform at least as well as anything else, in Windows
>named pipes or windows messages with "attached" shared memory blocks
>might perform better.
>Moreover you now easily can sp
Jason P Sage wrote:
Michael Schnell Wrote:
Why not use TCP/IP to send informations from one program to another ?
In
Linux this should perform at least as well as anything else, in Windows
named pipes or windows messages with "attached" shared memory blocks
might perform
I tried the simpleipc unit supplied with freepascal to try and eliminate
the the file based IPC I wrote - but in Linux - it was awful - and
seemed to have symptoms of thread safety - could be my end or FPC rtl -
I'm not sure.
I understood that you use multiple _programs_. If you use multiple
_
Jason P Sage schreef:
I used CGI for portability - but to counter the delay of loading
involved CGI executables - I created a very thin CGI client (50k on
Win32 - unfortunately - 250k+ on Linux - (something about the smart
linking isn't as good on linux).
My next two agendas are creating m
Haven't read this thread, so I might be off-topic a bit in the following:
On Windows the best way to copy data in my opinion is WM_COPYDATA message,
but I'm not sure if on Vista it will work ok (haven't tried). If you want to
try it see http://plugs.onestop.net
George Birbilis ([
11 matches
Mail list logo
