On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:51:09 +0200
Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linux firewall should have something like:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type fragmentation-needed -j ACCEPT
And also in FORWARD and OUTPUT, but it may be that you already have a rule to
allow 'RELATED' traffi
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:18:24 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote:
>
> > Yes, any sensible sysadmin ought to know that ICMP fragment error
> > packets (type 3, code 4?) should always be allowed.
>
> Can you please translate
Date sent: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 02:41:30 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
From: Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] webserver
Send reply to: FPC devel
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 21:45 +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Same here, and I can ping www.freepascal.org till 8184.
> >>
> >>The size at which yo
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 21:45 +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Same here, and I can ping www.freepascal.org till 8184.
>>
>>The size at which you can ping www.freepascal.org isn't relevant, that
>>just means
However, I just tried to ping from www.freepascal.org to the machine
mentioned here by someone (xzone.dyndns.org) and packets with size of
16000 went through without problems...
Not sure will this help but today I can access www.freepascal.org from the same
machine that has not been able to do thi
Date sent: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FPC developers' list
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] webserver
Send reply to: FPC developers' list
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 23:44 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> That is what I did: I pinged www.google.be from www.freepascal.org.
> and the maximum size was 1472.
You should be able to ping much higher unless you do 'ping -M dont ...'
since
The fact that you cannot suggests that there may be s
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 21:45 +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> > Same here, and I can ping www.freepascal.org till 8184.
>
> The size at which you can ping www.freepascal.org isn't relevant, that
> just means that you are not blocking 'fragmentatio
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 21:45 +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Same here, and I can ping www.freepascal.org till 8184.
The size at which you can ping www.freepascal.org isn't relevant, that
just means that you are not blocking 'fragmentation needed' packets.
Interesting might be the size at whi
>From the ping tests that have just been sent in, it's clear that it
works for high MTUs also.
But it doesnt neccessarily show that any "Fragmentation needed" packages
can reach the server - which is the thing we need to proof or disproof,
I'd say...
And i'm sorry - i have no idea how this could b
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> > >
> >
> > you could maybe try to ping google or something with huge package.
> > remember to add the header size in mind.
>
> Works with size up to 1472. (+28=1500, so this figures)
> Conslusion you pull from this test ?
Same here, and I can ping
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Peter Vreman schrieb:
> >>
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
>
> >On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Here
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > I don't think it is the server, as the MTU size of the server didn't change.
> >
> > The router is outside my control; It's controlled by the ISP;
> > So there is nothing I can do a
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>
>
>>Peter Vreman schrieb:
>>
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>
>
>
>>Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
>>to
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
>
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:24:13 +0200
>>Daniel Herzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Quite a few now said it might be the case that it's firewall blocks all
>>>icmp packages. Try lowering the servers mtu for the
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:17 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> I don't think it is the server, as the MTU size of the server didn't change.
>
> The router is outside my control; It's controlled by the ISP;
> So there is nothing I can do about it. If you can tell me how to determine
> it's MTU s
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:24:13 +0200
> Daniel Herzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quite a few now said it might be the case that it's firewall blocks all
> > icmp packages. Try lowering the servers mtu for the fun with it.
>
> Yes, any sensible sy
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Peter Vreman schrieb:
> >>Jonas Maebe schrieb:
> >>
> >>>On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:24:13 +0200
Daniel Herzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite a few now said it might be the case that it's firewall blocks all
> icmp packages. Try lowering the servers mtu for the fun with it.
Yes, any sensible sysadmin ought to know that ICMP fragment error packets (type
Peter Vreman schrieb:
>>Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>>
>>>On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>>>
>>>
Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my
mtu
far more...i want some troughput.
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>>
>> On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>>
>>> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
>>> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my
>>> mtu
>>> far more...i want some troughput.
>>
>>
>> I don't know what
Try www.jp.freepascal.org as a workaround (works nice here), or the
google cache.
But I still will not be able to fill / browse bug reports!
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>> ISP and consequently DNS has changed. Check the IP address.
>> It should be 62.166.198.202
>>
>> But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
>> somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
>
>
> Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now
>
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:56 +0400, Alexey Barkovoy wrote:
> > But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
> > somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
>
> Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now
> (maybe
> even more). Sometimes it's j
ISP and consequently DNS has changed. Check the IP address.
It should be 62.166.198.202
But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now (maybe
even more). Somet
Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my mtu
far more...i want some troughput.
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't know what or where the problem is, but you're the first person I
>>>hear of who can't reac
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
> >
> > On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> >
> >> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
> >> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my mtu
> >> far more...
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
> On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>
>> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
>> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my mtu
>> far more...i want some troughput.
>
>
> I don't know what or where t
On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my
mtu
far more...i want some troughput.
I don't know what or where the problem is, but you're the first person
I
>>i cannot access http://www.freepascal.org/ for days.
>>
>>I can ping it, and wget establishes a connection ("200 OK" )but cant
>>download any data. ftp and www.jp.freepascal.org work fine.
>>
>>please fix this, it worked nice here until the last week or so.
>
>
> One of the sites of freepascal.
> i cannot access http://www.freepascal.org/ for days.
>
> I can ping it, and wget establishes a connection ("200 OK" )but cant
> download any data. ftp and www.jp.freepascal.org work fine.
>
> please fix this, it worked nice here until the last week or so.
One of the sites of freepascal.org had
32 matches
Mail list logo
