Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > The definitions of templates, inline procedures or macros do not
> > immediately contribute to the size of a compiled module, only when they
> > are *used* in code modules.
>
> That goes for all routines.
I'm not sure what you mean. A global procedure, exported in t
A friend of mine just has tested my archiver, with the following results
for an TAR with a million of files:
PowerArchiver: 530 minutes.
My Unarch: 160 minutes.
I hope to get the original .tgz archive soon, in order to test it with
GNU gzip and tar as well. The time may decrease again when the lo
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, DrDiettrich wrote:
> A friend of mine just has tested my archiver, with the following results
> for an TAR with a million of files:
>
> PowerArchiver: 530 minutes.
> My Unarch: 160 minutes.
Huh ?
Who creates archives with million of files ?
Who creates a million of files
Hi all,
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
My suggestion would be the same dir as the fpc source tar ball, i.e.
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/mirrors/fpc/
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:29 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, DrDiettrich wrote:
>
> > A friend of mine just has tested my archiver, with the following results
> > for an TAR with a million of files:
> >
> > PowerArchiver: 530 minutes.
> > My Unarch: 160 minutes.
>
> Hu
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
> it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
> with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
640 K ? Is that a joke ? The compiler sources alone
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
> > it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
> > with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
>
> 640 K ? Is that a joke ? The compil
On 29 mrt 2005, at 15:52, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
with the ppc386 binary and a default fpc.cfg file.
640 K ? Is that a joke ? The compiler sources alone are more th
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In order to get fpc into portage, the gentoo packaging system
> > > it would be necessary to make available a bootstrap tar ball (640 KB)
> > > with the ppc386 binary and
Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
This is done via ebuilds.
There is grap this file:
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
And compile and install it.
To do this, i need a starting compiler, nothing more.
It
>>i cannot access http://www.freepascal.org/ for days.
>>
>>I can ping it, and wget establishes a connection ("200 OK" )but cant
>>download any data. ftp and www.jp.freepascal.org work fine.
>>
>>please fix this, it worked nice here until the last week or so.
>
>
> One of the sites of freepascal.
> Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
>
> Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
> This is done via ebuilds.
> There is grap this file:
> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
> And compile and install it.
Don't expect this directory to exists very lo
>>Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
>>
>>Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
>>This is done via ebuilds.
>>There is grap this file:
>>ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
>>And compile and install it.
>
>
> Don't expect this directory to exists
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Okay. I'll totally rephrase this now:
>
> Gentoo builds (almost) everything from source.
> This is done via ebuilds.
> There is grap this file:
> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/beta/source-1.9.8/fpc-1.9.8.source.tar.gz
> And compile and install it.
Thanks. I'll, for now, work around it using the binary.tar.
In practise, the only "problem" is the bigger download, and getting the
ppc386 out of it...
> This was clear from the beginning :)
> But thank you for taking the trouble yo elaborate.
>
> We're discussing on the core list how we can acc
On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my
mtu
far more...i want some troughput.
I don't know what or where the problem is, but you're the first person
I
Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
> On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>
>> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
>> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my mtu
>> far more...i want some troughput.
>
>
> I don't know what or where t
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
> >
> > On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> >
> >> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
> >> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my mtu
> >> far more...
Even better:
One single archive containing all ppc* starting compilers - this way i
could also package it quite easily for all arches, and it would easy to
script it using "ppc${ARCH}" everywhere...you see?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.free
Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my mtu
far more...i want some troughput.
>>>
>>>
>>>I don't know what or where the problem is, but you're the first person I
>>>hear of who can't reac
ISP and consequently DNS has changed. Check the IP address.
It should be 62.166.198.202
But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now (maybe
even more). Somet
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 19:47 +0200, Daniel Herzog wrote:
> No matter what i change all those mtu's to - 1460 byte will be the
> bigges package that works.
Are you clamping the tcp window size correctly on 0.1? If you can't do
it there maybe try on 0.2.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:56 +0400, Alexey Barkovoy wrote:
> > But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
> > somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
>
> Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now
> (maybe
> even more). Sometimes it's j
>>No matter what i change all those mtu's to - 1460 byte will be the
>>bigges package that works.
>
>
> Are you clamping the tcp window size correctly on 0.1? If you can't do
> it there maybe try on 0.2.
>
> johannes
Explain please. (All but 0.1 are Linux, 0.1 is a D-Link device)
>> ISP and consequently DNS has changed. Check the IP address.
>> It should be 62.166.198.202
>>
>> But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
>> somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
>
>
> Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now
>
Try www.jp.freepascal.org as a workaround (works nice here), or the
google cache.
But I still will not be able to fill / browse bug reports!
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> > > immediately contribute to the size of a compiled module, only when they
> > > are *used* in code modules.
> >
> > That goes for all routines.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. A global procedure, exported in the
> interface section of a unit, always must be be c
A sample configuration, or the great (i really like it) samplecfg tool,
are needed, to avoid possibly broken/outdated/... /etc/fpc.cfg files
please add this somehow too.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.o
> A sample configuration, or the great (i really like it) samplecfg tool,
> are needed, to avoid possibly broken/outdated/... /etc/fpc.cfg files
>
> please add this somehow too.
>
I'm sorry. Forget about it - OPT="-n" solves it...
___
fpc-devel maillis
>> A sample configuration, or the great (i really like it) samplecfg tool,
>> are needed, to avoid possibly broken/outdated/... /etc/fpc.cfg files
>>
>> please add this somehow too.
>>
> I'm sorry. Forget about it - OPT="-n" solves it...
This is not needed. The top Makefile already sets RELEASE=1
> Even better:
> One single archive containing all ppc* starting compilers - this way i
> could also package it quite easily for all arches, and it would easy to
> script it using "ppc${ARCH}" everywhere...you see?
I don't see it. Because that package will be huge since you need a ppc for
every cp
> Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>>
>> On 29 mrt 2005, at 16:40, Daniel Herzog wrote:
>>
>>> Here it doesnt. I even tried to change the mtu of all relevant systems
>>> to 1400 instead of 1500, which didnt help also...and i cant lower my
>>> mtu
>>> far more...i want some troughput.
>>
>>
>> I don't know what
Hello,
The Free Pascal Compiler team is proud to announce that the Free Pascal
Compiler has been selected to participate in IBM's Linux On Power
contest. The goal is to create a port for Linux running on PowerPC 64
bit processors. The current compiler already contains support for Linux
running
33 matches
Mail list logo
