Re: [fpc-devel] BlackFin

2007-04-13 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Michael Schnell schrieb: > HI FP experts. > > Is there any decent chance that there is or that it's possible to create > a cross compiler to run FP programs on an Analog Devices BlackFin CPU > that runs the appropriate Linux distribution ? No. Not without pushing a port to it in some way. ___

Re: [fpc-devel] BlackFin

2007-04-13 Thread Michael Schnell
No. Not without pushing a port to it in some way. Thanks. And I suppose doing a port for that processor would be quite a lot of work, regarding the ASM code is very strange if you compare it to the code of 80x86, PPC or ARM. -Michael ___ fpc-de

[fpc-devel] Submitted bug report on option order -Sa -Sg-

2007-04-13 Thread Tom Verhoeff
I just submitted a bug report (8686) on an option order problem involving assertion checking (-Sa). We got bitten badly by this, since it affects our automatic homework checker (PEACH), that also tests to see if expected exceptions are indeed raised. E.g. students need to include appropriate Asse

Re: [fpc-devel] BlackFin

2007-04-13 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Michael Schnell schrieb: > >> No. Not without pushing a port to it in some way. >> > Thanks. And I suppose doing a port for that processor would be quite a > lot of work, Well, this depends how good one wants to make such a port ... > regarding the ASM code is very strange if you compare it

Re: [fpc-devel] BlackFin

2007-04-13 Thread Johann Glaser
Hi! > > regarding the ASM code is very strange if you compare it to > > the code of 80x86, PPC or ARM. > > As far as I have seen the BlackFin has two cores: an arm like risc core > and a dsp. The BlackFin and other Analog Devices DSPs have an uncommon assembler syntax. Contrary to well-known mne

Re: [fpc-devel] win64 on trunk broken

2007-04-13 Thread Vincent Snijders
Florian Klaempfl schreef: Jonas Maebe schrieb: On 12 apr 2007, at 19:14, Vincent Snijders wrote: This is the same IE as in http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=8580 Just a quick update, I tracked down the revision that broke it: r6855. Note that this revision did not break win64, it