Re: [fpc-pascal]My object function is overriding real function

2004-02-19 Thread Jeremy Cowgar
Quoting Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Use explicit namespacing: System.Close(sin) Thank you all for the many responses. I now understand a bit more about the namespaces and have a working program :) Thanks, Jeremy ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [E

Re: [fpc-pascal] Weird DosError values

2004-02-19 Thread xhajt03
From:"Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Weird DosError values Date sent: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:13:23 -0500 Hi Lukas > I'm running Win 2000, and using sysutils, and dos - > could that be the problem? Yes, that is the problem. You h

Re: [fpc-pascal]Error Making CVS version of compiler

2004-02-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > fixed in between. However, you'll probably have to start cycling > > with a 1.0.10 compiler. This is a general rule - if cycling > > doesn't work with the snapshot, try to start with the latest > > official _release_ version (not beta!) - this rule should be > > added to the build FAQ probably.

Re: [fpc-pascal]Error Making CVS version of compiler

2004-02-19 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:06:51 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Matt Henley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[fpc-pascal]Error Making CVS version of compiler Date sent: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:06:49 -0600 . . /usr/local/bin/ppc38

Re: [fpc-pascal]RE: Defining Records on the fly:

2004-02-19 Thread Matt Emson
> ^_^ Thats how its working at the moment and I've known that FPC doesn't > do that kinda definition on the fly. My real question was why not? Because Pascal is not a dynamically typed language. C/C++ doesn't do this kind of thing either. Not 'on the fly' without any basic types defined. Matt

Re: [fpc-pascal]My object function is overriding real function

2004-02-19 Thread Matt Emson
> I have a object that connects to a speech server, festival. In my > object, I define a function called close. This must close the socket > connection, which is done by the function close. Therefore, I am having > a problem, because simply calling close with the sin and sout parameters > results i

Re: [fpc-pascal]Error Making CVS version of compiler

2004-02-19 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 19 feb 2004, at 03:23, Mattias Gaertner wrote: I don't want to critize you, but I think, a 1.9.3 should be able to compile a newer 1.9.3. This has never been guaranteed in the past and also won't be guaranteed in the future. The only guarantee is that the latest release version (which is sti

Re: [fpc-pascal]Error Making CVS version of compiler

2004-02-19 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:06:51 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: "Matt Henley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:[fpc-pascal]Error Making CVS version of compiler > Date sent: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:06:49 -0600 > > . > . > > /usr/local/bin/ppc386 -Ur

RE: [fpc-pascal]Convert C to Pascal

2004-02-19 Thread Peter Vreman
> Thanks for your help, > > 1. that means this command > reg_drq_block_call_back = 0; > is in Pascal > reg_drq_block_call_back := nil; > > 2. if ( ! reg_drq_block_call_back ) > { >... > } > is in Pascal > if reg_drq_block_call_back = nil then > begin >

RE: [fpc-pascal]Convert C to Pascal

2004-02-19 Thread Lubomir . Cabla
Thanks for your help, 1. that means this command reg_drq_block_call_back = 0; is in Pascal reg_drq_block_call_back := nil; 2. if ( ! reg_drq_block_call_back ) { ... } is in Pascal if reg_drq_block_call_back = nil then begin ... end; 3. if ( reg_d