Re: [fpc-pascal] interface "is" patch (finished and included)

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote: i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list (usually devel list is for inter

Re: [fpc-pascal] interface "is" patch (finished and included)

Quoting Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote: > > > i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response > > on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list > > (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regula

Re: [fpc-pascal] interface "is" patch (finished and included)

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, ml wrote: > i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response > on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list > (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and > others are... well,... for others (as well a

[fpc-pascal] interface "is" patch (finished and included)

i included again my refcount patch (haven't got even a little response on it. i'm slowly starting to wonder if i'm on the right mailing list (usually devel list is for internal purposes of regular developers, and others are... well,... for others (as well as bug reporting as patches)), i got more r