Re: [fpc-pascal] Extending FPDoc

2005-09-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Darius Blaszijk wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:17, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > I'd rather you keep these todo separate. It'll slow down parsing > > (which is already horribly slow) and I see no added value. If you must > Could you elaborate on that?? I don't see a prob

FW: [fpc-pascal] Opening .dta and .key files

2005-09-18 Thread Cox, Stuart TRAN:EX
I'd guess that these two file types are data and index files produced by the programmer of your TP program when he used the "Turbo Pascal Database Toolbox" as the database manager. Borland gave some hints that they might release the source code for these toolboxes a few years ago but I've yet to

RE: [fpc-pascal] Opening .dta and .key files

2005-09-18 Thread Cox, Stuart TRAN:EX
I'd guess that these two file types are data and index files produced by the programmer of your TP program when he used the "Turbo Pascal Database Toolbox" as the database manager. Borland gave some hints that they might release the source code for these toolboxes a few years ago but I've yet to s

Re: [fpc-pascal] Extending FPDoc

2005-09-18 Thread Darius Blaszijk
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:14, Sebastian Günther wrote: > I think I can easily add this. I think it would be sufficient to 'just' > support it, without usage within the doc writers? I don't see much use in that. If text does not appear back in the documentation then there is no point adding text.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Extending FPDoc

2005-09-18 Thread Darius Blaszijk
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:17, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > I'd rather you keep these todo separate. It'll slow down parsing > (which is already horribly slow) and I see no added value. If you must Could you elaborate on that?? I don't see a problem in adding a tag. While indeed it will slow down par