Hello,
I am trying to catch the possible exceptions that may ocur
when executing processes with TProcess (such as cases when
the program doesn't exist or is not in the path).
try
p := TProcess.Create(nil);
p.CommandLine := 'psql';
p.Options := p.Options +
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Adrian Maier wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to catch the possible exceptions that may ocur
when executing processes with TProcess (such as cases when
the program doesn't exist or is not in the path).
try
p := TProcess.Create(nil);
p.CommandLine := 'psql';
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
I fully agree!!!
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 3/15/06, Bisma Jayadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at
http://delphi.org/
Sorry... stupid mistypo. :P It should be:
http://opendelphi.org/
:D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at
http://beeography.wordpress.com
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p
And totally unrealistic.
- price is way to low (50 times that is more reasonable I think)
- not just the source is not for sale,
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p
You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but
not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler alone, and the VCL
memsom wrote:
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p
You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but
not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler
What he meant is that supporting fpc/lazarus development
is a quite more tangible task than trying to buy and support delphi.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:54:38 -0300, memsom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they
http://delphi.org/
Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p
Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p
You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but
not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler alone, and the
You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but
not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler alone, and the VCL (full VCL), and
defacto support for all (not just a subset) of Delphi features.
The idea is that it´s much, much cheapier to invest on Lazarus and
Free Pascal and
Who gets the $22,000 they have raised so far, if their plan doesn't work out?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
They haven't raised any money yet. The money will only be collected if
Borland were to accept an offer from these folks. The amount so far is
more akin to pledges.
Mark
L505 wrote:
Who gets the $22,000 they have raised so far, if their plan doesn't work out?
Peter Vreman schreef:
More specific, the error-lines point to the @object construct.
Is there any way I can avoid these errors ?
I used revision 2898 of fpc. My arm-linux-as is version 2.14.
Use the latest binutils 2.16.1
I downloaded and compiled them from http://www.gnuarm.com, then
Can someone point me to the documentation for the winsock unit? It doesn't
appear to exist
in the html docs, nor in the pdf doc either. A google search turned up nothing.
The unit
exists in the source tree, I have it installed, but where is the doc??
I have fpc-2.0.2 running on Linux, and have
On 3/15/06, Bob Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fpc-2.0.2 running on Linux
WinSock = Windows Sockets Linux Sockets ?
You might want to look at some of the abstraction libs available, such
as Synapse.
also, and i'm not sure about this, as i've been meaning to ask, but i
think the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:19:36 +0700
From: Bisma Jayadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed
Delphi 2006 for Win32 also incorperates a lot of the innovations nade in
Delphi.Net.
.Net? Though I had suggested FPC to also implement some new Delphi language
features which I think very usefull, but I agree with FPC core team that we
don't need to support .Net yet.
IMO, .Net is just a
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
Delphi 2006 for Win32 also incorperates a lot of the innovations nade in
Delphi.Net.
.Net? Though I had suggested FPC to also implement some new Delphi
language features which I think very usefull, but I agree with FPC core
team that we don't need to support .Net yet.
19 matches
Mail list logo
