Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Jesús Reyes A .
- Original Message - From: "Rimgaudas Laucius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions" Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:14 AM Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website Yes, this website is much better. But i do not like design of top menu (especialy highlighting and

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 29 Jun 06, at 0:19, Marc Santhoff wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 29.06.2006, 00:04 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: . . > My approach to detect failing FindFirst/FindNext would be to do > something like this: > > <--- rtl/unix/sysutils.pp:549 ---> > Function GlobToTSearchRec (Var Info : TSearc

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Tomas Hajny
On 28 Jun 06, at 23:41, Marc Santhoff wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 12:17 -0500 schrieb Jeff Pohlmeyer: . . > What I don't understand is why the var "errno" is not set or it's value > is destroyed before Findfirst/-Next return. Does this value has to be > set explicitely by using fpseterr

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Donnerstag, den 29.06.2006, 00:04 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Marc Santhoff wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 12:17 -0500 schrieb Jeff Pohlmeyer: > > > If I remember correctly, the DOS FindFirst/Next only handles > > > shortstring-sized path names. > >

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Marc Santhoff wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 12:17 -0500 schrieb Jeff Pohlmeyer: > > If I remember correctly, the DOS FindFirst/Next only handles > > shortstring-sized path names. > > If possible at all I will not use DOS unit. > > > Another "quirk" about using Find

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 12:17 -0500 schrieb Jeff Pohlmeyer: > If I remember correctly, the DOS FindFirst/Next only handles > shortstring-sized path names. If possible at all I will not use DOS unit. > Another "quirk" about using FindNext on Unix is that a > symlink to a directory sets the fa

[fpc-pascal] RE: findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Jeff Pohlmeyer
If I remember correctly, the DOS FindFirst/Next only handles shortstring-sized path names. Another "quirk" about using FindNext on Unix is that a symlink to a directory sets the faDirectory flag, and if it happens to be a circular symlink, I don't know of any way tell if it is safe to recurse in

Re: [fpc-pascal] findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Marc Santhoff
Okay, now I tried it but got no valuable result: $ ls -lF /usr/X11R6/include/ | grep / ... drwx-- 104 root wheel8192 6 Okt 2005 nvu-1.0/ ... $ ls -lF /usr/X11R6/ | grep include/ drwxr-xr-x 76 root wheel 10240 14 Mai 00:07 include/ I am allowed to read the last one, but not the fi

Re: [fpc-pascal] findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 18:13 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hajny: > Marc Santhoff wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hajny: > > > >> Which platform are you talking about, which FindFirst/FindNext > >> (Dos/SysUtils) and what is the behaviour expected from you? E.g. with:

Re: [fpc-pascal] findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 15:57 +0200 schrieb Marc Santhoff: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hajny: > > > Which platform are you talking about, which FindFirst/FindNext > > (Dos/SysUtils) and what is the behaviour expected from you? E.g. with: > > Sorry, I was too deep

Re: [fpc-pascal] findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Tomas Hajny
Marc Santhoff wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hajny: > >> Which platform are you talking about, which FindFirst/FindNext >> (Dos/SysUtils) and what is the behaviour expected from you? E.g. with: > > Sorry, I was too deep into the problem. > > I'm using FreeBSD as mai

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
2006/6/28, Rodrigo Palhano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: What website are you talking about ? :) http://www.freepascal.org/ -- Alexandre Leclerc ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pas

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Rimgaudas Laucius
Yes, this website is much better. But i do not like design of top menu (especialy highlighting and i suggest you to set mininum width for it). - Original Message - From: "Rodrigo Palhano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions" Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:40 PM Su

Re: [fpc-pascal] findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2006, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Tomas Hajny: > Which platform are you talking about, which FindFirst/FindNext > (Dos/SysUtils) and what is the behaviour expected from you? E.g. with: Sorry, I was too deep into the problem. I'm using FreeBSD as main platform for development but f

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
Clean fast and tableless, i like it. On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:35:56 -0300, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote: What website are you talking about ? http://www.freepascal.org/ Michael. ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote: What website are you talking about ? http://www.freepascal.org/ Michael. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
What website are you talking about ? On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:15:07 -0300, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeff Pohlmeyer wrote: Yes, much better! I had not even looked at it till now. One suggestion: I think the sentence about the M680 should be moved to the end of the first pa

Re: [fpc-pascal] findfirst and findnext on non accessible files

2006-06-28 Thread Tomas Hajny
Marc Santhoff wrote: Hi, > trying to use FindFirst and FindNext on files I cannot detect the > difference between a failed call because of no matching file and a > failure when the file or dir is not listable by the user lacking > permissions. > > If I'd use fpstat and friends myself this would

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Micha Nelissen
Jeff Pohlmeyer wrote: > One suggestion: I think the sentence about the M680 should > be moved to the end of the first paragraph. Finish telling > me about what you do support first. I'm only on the second > sentence of the entire website, and already they're telling > me what the old compiler does

Re: [fpc-pascal] RE: Nice website

2006-06-28 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Jeff Pohlmeyer wrote: > Yes, much better! > I had not even looked at it till now. > > One suggestion: I think the sentence about the M680 should > be moved to the end of the first paragraph. Finish telling > me about what you do support first. I'm only on the second > sentence of the entire websit