Hi all,
I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
revision 3823 I have no problems.
The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not
working well.. this was an old bug... parameter
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
revision 3823 I have no problems.
The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not
working well..
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
>The parameters in the script
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
>T
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>> That are 1300+ revisions. Try doing a binary search. That will take 11
>> tests.
>
> How do a do such a thing?
You know binary search right ? Use svn diff -r X, with X varying between
working and newest revision, until you found X-1 working, X not.
Micha
_
At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote:
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using
>revision 3823 I have no problems.
--- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> compiler
> in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok?
> Using
> revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
> The parameters in the script when passed to
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote:
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler
>> >in svn. Is there a compiler switch required
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> compiler
> in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok?
> Using
> revision 3823 I have no problems.
>
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 09:10 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Lev Lafayette wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 15:58 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Lev Lafayette wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > First let me say how pleased I am to disco
10 matches
Mail list logo