[fpc-pascal] -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Fabio Dell'Aria
Hi to all, is someone working on the -Xg lineinfo/lnfodwrf support, so that using a separate .dbg file for the debug, the software is able to show the call-stack with source line? Another questions... What are currently the OS that supports the -Xg flag? -- Best regards... Fabio Dell'Aria.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Accessing ROM BIOS Font in Linux.

2008-01-20 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Anthony W.Henry wrote: One thing I'd add is that using Delphi it's possible (although not trivial) to embed a .fon as a resource in an executable. I don't know the extent to which this can be done using (in particular) Lazarus on Windows or on Linux. I imagine the easiest way is bin2obj

Re: [fpc-pascal] -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Peter Vreman
Hi to all, is someone working on the -Xg lineinfo/lnfodwrf support, so that using a separate .dbg file for the debug, the software is able to show the call-stack with source line? Make sure you use the latest svn code. There are already a lot of things refactored regarding the reading those

Re: [fpc-pascal] -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 20 Jan 2008, at 13:03, Peter Vreman wrote: What are currently the OS that supports the -Xg flag? For the moment Windows only and i'm looking at Linux. Also Darwin+dwarf. Jonas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org

Re: [fpc-pascal] -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Peter Vreman
Hi to all, is someone working on the -Xg lineinfo/lnfodwrf support, so that using a separate .dbg file for the debug, the software is able to show the call-stack with source line? Please stop working on this. I have it already working. Peter ___

[fpc-pascal] Re: -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Fabio Dell'Aria
Ok Peter, I'm waiting for your news. 2008/1/20, Peter Vreman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi to all, is someone working on the -Xg lineinfo/lnfodwrf support, so that using a separate .dbg file for the debug, the software is able to show the call-stack with source line? Please stop working on

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Peter Vreman
Ok Peter, I'm waiting for your news. Finished, see r9813 ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: -Xg flag and lineinfo/lnfodwrf support

2008-01-20 Thread Vincent Snijders
Fabio Dell'Aria schreef: Ok Peter, I'm waiting for your news. Tip: subscribe to http://svn.freepascal.org/feeds/fpcsvn.rss. Vincent ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

[fpc-pascal] FreePascal Coding style

2008-01-20 Thread Damien Gerard
Is there a standard Coding style for FreePascal (Pascal) available which programmers should use ? It is for my boss :) -- Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Le temps n'a pas d'importance. Seul le code est important -- (f00ty) ___ fpc-pascal

Re: RES: [fpc-pascal] dot within unit file name

2008-01-20 Thread Vinzent Hoefler
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:12, John Stoneham wrote: [Ada package system] However, you can also do: with Unit_1; use Unit_1; This imports the namespace of Unit_1 into the current file so that now you *can* refernce foo without a qualifier. It's as if all the identifiers in Unit_1 were