Paul,
yes I agree with you, that fpGUI is very nice for embedded GUI systems -
and I think it has potential for more. The next thing I will look at, is
why it draws a frame around labels etc. in WinCE - do you have the same
issue ? Should be a minor problem.
Adrian.
Am 16.03.2010 17:59, schrieb
Am 16.03.2010 16:11, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> On 16 March 2010 15:03, Adrian Veith wrote:
>
>> Now my second solution works:
>>
>
> Thank you very much. I'll take a look at the code and test on my
> Garmin in the next day or two.
>
yes please, and if it works please
security rule #1 : never assume anything...
2010/3/7 lyh1 :
> But ShortStrings also store the length in string[0]. If I do a append, I
> think the string will append to string[1]
> So don't assume string are always initialized with null string?
>
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 00:17
Versions x.x.1, x.x.3, x.x.5 are development versions? or are bug fixes?
Ex.: 2.4.1
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 18 Mar 2010, at 00:10, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
> Versions x.x.1, x.x.3, x.x.5 are development versions? or are bug fixes?
>
> Ex.: 2.4.1
x.[0,2,4,6,9].[1,3,5,7,9] are bug fixes versions (with also minor features that
should not affect stability too much)
x.[1,3,5,6,9].x are development version
Please, where is this information?
2010/3/17 Jonas Maebe :
>
> On 18 Mar 2010, at 00:10, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
>
>> Versions x.x.1, x.x.3, x.x.5 are development versions? or are bug fixes?
>>
>> Ex.: 2.4.1
>
> x.[0,2,4,6,9].[1,3,5,7,9] are bug fixes versions (with also minor features
> that should
On 18 Mar 2010, at 00:30, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
> 2010/3/17 Jonas Maebe :
>>
>> On 18 Mar 2010, at 00:10, Osvaldo Filho wrote:
>>
>>> Versions x.x.1, x.x.3, x.x.5 are development versions? or are bug fixes?
>>>
>>> Ex.: 2.4.1
>>
>> x.[0,2,4,6,9].[1,3,5,7,9] are bug fixes versions (with also mi
On 3/17/2010 7:47 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
Please, where is this information?
http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#versions
On that page should this be changed to recommend 2.4.x?
"We advise all users to upgrade to the newest version for their target
(Preferably the new stable 2.2.x ser
OK,
I had a bunch of "WriteLn" in my program, so that is how I knew it was running to
completion. But I have removed them for this test. I changed my source from sending a chr(4) to
pipe.closeinput, which seemed to give a little cleaner run in Lazarus. My test linux command is
just a "ls -l"
