Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior schrieb:
actually, for most porpuses, ansistring is a lot faster than normal
strings with size 255...
you pass around 4 bytes instead of 256...
That would be only true if you have multiple variables pointing to the same
string without changing each instance. I don't b
On 21 Mar 2010, at 21:07, Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior wrote:
> actually, for most porpuses, ansistring is a lot faster than normal
> strings with size 255...
>
> you pass around 4 bytes instead of 256...
And on the downside the compiler inserts a lot of initialisation/finalisation
and reference
actually, for most porpuses, ansistring is a lot faster than normal
strings with size 255...
you pass around 4 bytes instead of 256...
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Frank Church schrieb:
I recently posted a question about problems involving the use of
string and AnsiString when converting a Delphi program. Are the some
situations where substituting AnsiString for string will result in
errors?
The string type is a generic type and can be ShortString or AnsiS
I recently posted a question about problems involving the use of
string and AnsiString when converting a Delphi program. Are the some
situations where substituting AnsiString for string will result in
errors?
Does using {$mode delphi}, {H+} involve cases which might introduce
hard to track errors?
