Hi,
I am not comfortable with make and I was looking for why i get for
example ppcrossarm if I cross build with a one line like
make clean all install CROSSINSTALL=1 ...
and only pparm with
make clean all ...
make install CROSSINSTALL=1 ...
Reading makefile I understood why, now
On 22 May 2010, at 10:52, Thierry Bothorel wrote:
Reading makefile I understood why, now I wonder what is the benefit to
add the cross string inside the compiler file name ?
When you build the entire source tree for a different architecture than the
host architecture, both a cross-compiler
On 22 May 2010, at 12:56, Thierry Bothorel wrote:
Jonas Maebe a écrit :
When you build the entire source tree for a different architecture than the
host architecture, both a cross-compiler and a native compiler are created.
Both binaries are in fpc/compiler, so they have to have different
Thank you for the information! I use FPC 2.4.0 but get this warning...
Then I don't know what the problem is. I cannot reproduce it.
It seems like the E flag is set.
That suggests that one of the object files used to link this library is
missing a .note.GNU-stack section for some
On 22 May 2010, at 14:00, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
That suggests that one of the object files used to link this library is
missing a .note.GNU-stack section for some reason.
How can I detect which one it is? (How can I list the sections of an object
file?)
readelf -S
If you compile the
On Sat, 22 May 2010 14:03:57 +0200, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
On 22 May 2010, at 14:00, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
That suggests that one of the object files used to link this library is
missing a .note.GNU-stack section for some reason.
How can I detect which one it is? (How
On 22 May 2010, at 19:25, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
I checked the files, all .o files had the section. But there was also an
.or file of the new FPC resource system in INPUT() this file had no
.note.GNU-stack section.
Is that relevant?
Actually, yes. The ELF resource writer should probably add
On Sat, 22 May 2010 20:38:59 +0200, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
On 22 May 2010, at 19:25, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
I checked the files, all .o files had the section. But there was also an
.or file of the new FPC resource system in INPUT() this file had no
.note.GNU-stack
