OK, I understand now. Thank you for explanation.
--
cobines
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 30 Jan 11, at 22:28 , cobines wrote:
> it is now a pointer to IBaseInterface, because of implicit QueryInterface?
The reference changes because you have explicitly cast (the implementing
object) to another interface.
> So, I think I can compare interface variables but first I have to
> bring
A more detailed answer:
iDesc holds TDescClass as IDescInterface
iBase holds TDescClass as IDescInterface
iBaseAsBase holds TBaseClass as IBaseInterface
iBase holds the IDescInterface interface because they are compile-time
compatible (the same as an ancestor object reference holding an object f
2011/1/31 Andrew Hall :
> Interfaces do not behave like classes. Each each interface
> implemented/supported by a class is unique - at runtime a "descendent"
> interface is entirely unrelated to its ancestor.
Ok, so in this assignment
var
iBase: IBaseInterface;
iDesc: IDescInterface;
begin
Interfaces do not behave like classes. Each each interface
implemented/supported by a class is unique - at runtime a "descendent"
interface is entirely unrelated to its ancestor.
Regards Andrew.
On 30 Jan 11, at 20:37 , cobines wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have attached a program about wh
Hello everyone,
I have attached a program about which I have a question.
Why does iBase have different value than iBaseAsBase? It seems simply
assigning to interface variable doesn't change it to base interface, I
have to explicitly use "as IBaseInterface". Is it correct?
Basically, I'm trying t
Hi,
On 28/01/2011 13:41, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Matt Emson said:
Anybody here using FPC on Haiku? If so, how well does it work compared
to under Windows or Linux?
Yes, me ! It should work well. But, as you can imagine, there is a lot
less testers under Haiku. So, b
On 30 Jan 2011, at 18:17, Geoffray Levasseur wrote:
> On Sunday 30 January 2011 14:49:29 Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> Not really. The default -O2 will be pretty much optimal. Only if you have
>> an SSE3 capable cpu, you can add OPT="-Cfsse3" at the end of make command
>> line. It won't make much of a di
On Sunday 30 January 2011 14:42:10 ik wrote:
> LFS is usually installed from an existed linux distro, so you should
> install it on the hosting linux, and then compile it to your own distro
> (LFS is to build your own base at least).
Yes that's a possibility but bootstraping is cleaner so I prefer
On Sunday 30 January 2011 14:49:29 Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2011, at 14:35, Geoffray Levasseur wrote:
> > I suppose I'll have to download a precompiled version for my system
> > (x86_64) but I want do do this in a clean way.
>
> Assuming "LFS" in your mail meant "Linux From Scratch", you can
On 30 Jan 2011, at 14:35, Geoffray Levasseur wrote:
> I suppose I'll have to download a precompiled version for my system (x86_64)
> but I want do do this in a clean way.
Assuming "LFS" in your mail meant "Linux From Scratch", you can a download
bootstrap binary from
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 15:35, Geoffray Levasseur wrote:
> Hi everybody...
>
> My problem is simple. As far as I know there's no way to build FPC without
> FPC. So can anybody can tell me how to bootstrap FPC to build it on a LFS
> system without FPC installed?
>
LFS is usually installed from an
In our previous episode, Geoffray Levasseur said:
>
> My problem is simple. As far as I know there's no way to build FPC without
> FPC. So can anybody can tell me how to bootstrap FPC to build it on a LFS
> system without FPC installed?
Crosscompile. Either by entirely linking on host, or to as
Hi everybody...
My problem is simple. As far as I know there's no way to build FPC without
FPC. So can anybody can tell me how to bootstrap FPC to build it on a LFS
system without FPC installed?
I suppose I'll have to download a precompiled version for my system (x86_64)
but I want do do this
Hello Bo,
Sunday, January 30, 2011, 9:46:22 AM, you wrote:
BB> And now this thread appears here that is very similar to what I need.
BB> If a Lazarus/FPC implementation is created, possibly using the
BB> OpenOffice hook described here, I would be very much interested too!
Please, forget my last
Title: Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: How to use GetElementById?
On Sunday, January 30, 2011 13:52 silvioprog wrote:
Sorry... but nobody? :(
Well, when you crosspost to two mailing lists (which you shouldn't ...), then also check both of them ;-) There was an answer on the Lazarus ML.
--
Best Rega
Hello Bo,
Sunday, January 30, 2011, 9:46:22 AM, you wrote:
BB> The problem is that in order to read them one must have an instance of
BB> MSOffice installed and it sometimes takes a long time to open each
BB> document too. So I have been on the lookout for some way to implement
BB> a program for
Sorry... but nobody? :(
2011/1/26 silvioprog
> Hi guys,
>
> I use the GetElementById in PHP with sucess, but in FPC I not know how use.
>
> In PHP I use (with sucess):
>
> ...
> $dom = new DOMDocument();
> @$dom->loadHTML($data);
> $return = @$dom->getElementById('currency_converter_result')
On Sunday, January 30, 2011 11:07 Andreas Schneider wrote:
>On Sunday, January 30, 2011 09:46 Bo Berglund wrote:
>> The link above goes in the end to a download of *compiled* java code
>> so it is not that good for me. An FPC implementation would be really
>> useful though.
>
>
>The source code o
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:27:17 +0100, Andreas Schneider
wrote:
>On Friday, January 28, 2011 15:52 Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>> You're right. The command line is more simple.
>>> Thanks for the tip, I will try this.
>
>> I have not found
>
>Since you also mentioned that you need to access it from ASP,
20 matches
Mail list logo
