On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:52:30 -0300
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Mattias Gaertner
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I found the Wiki page about the new for-in loop and found a
> > misinformation. It stated wrongly that it is not possible to
> > have multiple enumerators per
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found the Wiki page about the new for-in loop and found a
> misinformation. It stated wrongly that it is not possible to
> have multiple enumerators per class. It even gave a proposal
> for a new feature that did not add anyt
Hi all,
I found the Wiki page about the new for-in loop and found a
misinformation. It stated wrongly that it is not possible to
have multiple enumerators per class. It even gave a proposal
for a new feature that did not add anything new.
I added an example how to add a second enumerator to a cla
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> Yeah, you're right... I didn't see this link. =)
> But see it one more time: the R instance of TRealClass is not
> released... saw? I didn't test but I think if R was released will
> occur an AV.
As I said, if we use R.Free...
W:\dev\te
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
> I don't understand why it would be wrong. For me it seams correct and
> similar to this example:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/How_To_Use_Interfaces_to_write_less_code
I'd like to use the same idea of link above, ie,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> >>> f := TFoo.Create;
> >>
> >> This is just wrong.
> >
> > Well, wrong just because the language is so but not because is ilogical,
> > right?
>
> I don't understa
Hi!
I made some changes for WinCE and want test. How I rebuild only the
RTL on windows?
I'm using WinXP, Lazarus 0.9.30.1 with fpc 2.4.4 + cross-arm
downloaded from daily snapshots.
The best regards,
Fabio
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
On Thursday 15 September 2011 17:43:22 Frank Church wrote:
>
> Where is the tmethodlist itself defined?
Oh, sorry.
http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/mselist.pas?view=markup
Martin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
On 15 September 2011 16:26, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:53:35 Frank Church wrote:
> > Are there some examples of that somewhere?
>
> or
>
> http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/msegui.pas?view=markup
> tmethodlist.
> Warning, tmethodlis
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:53:35 Frank Church wrote:
> Are there some examples of that somewhere?
or
http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/msegui.pas?view=markup
tmethodlist.
Warning, tmethodlist.remove() must be called before destroying the registered
objects.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>> f := TFoo.Create;
>>
>> This is just wrong.
>
> Well, wrong just because the language is so but not because is ilogical,
> right?
I don't understand why it would be wrong. For me it seams correct and
similar to this example:
http://wi
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:53:35 Frank Church wrote:
> Are there some examples of that somewhere?
>
http://svn.berlios.de/viewvc/mseide-msegui/trunk/lib/common/kernel/mseclasses.pas?view=markup
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasc
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 14 Sep 2011, at 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> BUT, if I create my TFoo without refcount should works, right?
>
> Only in some circumstances. These circumstances depend on when the compiler
> allocates temporary interface instances, and
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> On 14/09/2011 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>>
>> procedure Run;
>> var
>> f: TFoo; // << type is class, not interface
>> o: TObj;
>> begin
>> f := TFoo.Create;
>
> This is just wrong.
Well, wrong just because the language is so bu
On 15 September 2011 15:48, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:28:29 Frank Church wrote:
> > I have a form with some threaded objects that notify another form of
> events
> > by calling one of that forms events.
> >
> > I want to convert to a data module and any interested
On Thursday 15 September 2011 16:28:29 Frank Church wrote:
> I have a form with some threaded objects that notify another form of events
> by calling one of that forms events.
>
> I want to convert to a data module and any interested object to register
> for those notifications.
>
> My idea is fo
I have a form with some threaded objects that notify another form of events
by calling one of that forms events.
I want to convert to a data module and any interested object to register for
those notifications.
My idea is for each thread to have some kind of list of procedure types and
each inter
Yes, I don't use this. I access the LCL methods via
TThread.Synchronize, On my mind, I'm doing this right... Correct me if
I'm wrong.
The bug related tells that TThread.Synchronize don't work as expected
in WinCE as in others OS's. It has two examples that don't work as
expected on WinCE, both wit
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Fabio Luis Girardi
wrote:
> I'm porting a multi-thread project to WinCE. Everything works fine,
> except when I put a Label (or any window control) on any form and link
> it with the data coming from any thread. My question is: What's the
> current state of the Win
Yes, the current FPC has this feature. Maybe the problem with WinCE
with multithreading is this:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18756
and not the use or not of Unaligned keyword.
Added with some outdated documentation on Wiki, this cause a little of
confusion in the mind of who starts wi
On 14 Sep 2011, at 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
BUT, if I create my TFoo without refcount should works, right?
Only in some circumstances. These circumstances depend on when the
compiler allocates temporary interface instances, and when these are
finalized.
... but, does not work. In D
On 8-9-2011 9:16, michael.vancanneyt-0is9kj9s...@public.gmane.org wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>> Am I missing something obvious or does it make sense to expose something
>> like a SupportedFieldTypes property for datasets?
>> How does Delphi do this?
>
> It does not.
>>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 14/09/2011 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> >
> > procedure Run;
> > var
> > f: TFoo; // << type is class, not interface
> > o: TObj;
> > begin
> > f := TFoo.Create;
>
> This is just wrong.
>
>
1 - If i use the class not Interfa
On 14/09/2011 23:17, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
> procedure Run;
> var
> f: TFoo; // << type is class, not interface
> o: TObj;
> begin
> f := TFoo.Create;
This is just wrong.
> BUT, if I create my TFoo without refcount should works, right?
> So, I change my class:
>
> TFoo = class(TObje
24 matches
Mail list logo
