On 12-10-11 08:12, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
On 11-10-11 22:05, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen wrote:
That's a problem, since that error was fixed in revision 19238.
Btw. I just tested, and I had no problem building the svn trunk version
using fpc 2.71. What version of fpc did you try to build with?
Rega
On 11-10-11 22:05, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen wrote:
That's a problem, since that error was fixed in revision 19238.
Btw. I just tested, and I had no problem building the svn trunk version
using fpc 2.71. What version of fpc did you try to build with?
Regards,
Jeppe
Hi,
I tried with 19167, like
Den 11-10-2011 21:59, Koenraad Lelong skrev:
On 11-10-11 15:56, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen wrote:
Those errors seem to relate to some recent changes in the way heap
management is done. Last I checked it worked just fine, but other things
might have changed which broke it. I'll try to confirm if it's
On 11-10-11 15:56, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen wrote:
Those errors seem to relate to some recent changes in the way heap
management is done. Last I checked it worked just fine, but other things
might have changed which broke it. I'll try to confirm if it's broken
later on
But if you try revision 1916
Am 11.10.2011 15:44, schrieb Vincent Snijders:
Hi,
Is it allowed to execute a TProcess object more than once? And if yes,
different command lines be used?
The reason I ask is issue 19997, each invocation of the compiler in
Lazarus leaks a process handle and a thread handle on windows. (not
test
Those errors seem to relate to some recent changes in the way heap
management is done. Last I checked it worked just fine, but other things
might have changed which broke it. I'll try to confirm if it's broken
later on
But if you try revision 19167 then those changes shouldn't be there. I'm
f
Hi,
Is it allowed to execute a TProcess object more than once? And if yes,
different command lines be used?
The reason I ask is issue 19997, each invocation of the compiler in
Lazarus leaks a process handle and a thread handle on windows. (not
tested on other OS-es).
If is it allowed to re-use T
Am 11.10.2011 06:32, schrieb leledumbo:
Is it possible to write one? Due to the nature of enumerator, the iterator
and iterated class usually form mutual dependency. With normal classes, this
is no problem as mutual dependency can be resolved with forward type
declaration. But what if it's used w
