Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I have no idea about your question, but it might be interresting for
you to know, just in case you already don't, the wiki page about the
new Regexpr in FPC: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Regexpr
It almost works: Exec() is OK (at least with trunk, I migh
2011/12/3 Jonas Maebe :
> Note that the "inc" comes before the loop body and the "dec" is inside
> [...]
> That's for code alignment.
You are right. It seems I shouldn't have drunken so much coffee today
and not have worked for so long or I would have easily seen where the
JG jumps to ;-)
I think
On 03 Dec 2011, at 21:41, Bernd wrote:
> Hello, I have observed something I do not understand. The following is
> a series of for-loops and the generated code looks strange to me.
> There always appears an inc followed by a dec
Note that the "inc" comes before the loop body and the "dec" is insi
Am 03.12.2011 21:41, schrieb Bernd:
> Hello, I have observed something I do not understand. The following is
> a series of for-loops and the generated code looks strange to me.
> There always appears an inc followed by a dec
Leaving the inc away would require an additional jump to do the abort
ch
Hello, I have observed something I do not understand. The following is
a series of for-loops and the generated code looks strange to me.
There always appears an inc followed by a dec and what is even more
bizarre is the code in between it: sometimes it inserts a mov
%esi,%esi, sometimes lea0x0(
On 3 December 2011 16:29, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no idea about your question, but it might be interresting for
> you to know, just in case you already don't, the wiki page about the
> new Regexpr in FPC: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/R
I have no idea about your question, but it might be interresting for
you to know, just in case you already don't, the wiki page about the
new Regexpr in FPC: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Regexpr
> It almost works: Exec() is OK (at least with trunk, I might have seen a
> problem with a vers
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Has anybody with experience of WideStrings tried compiling the "new" Regexpr
unit to support them?
Which "new" Regexpr? The one in packages/regexpr or another one?
I always thought that the one I adde
On 3 December 2011 14:46, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> Hi, does anyone knows if there is a Markdown parser already developed for
> FreePascal?.
I started a Markdown and Creole parser about a year or two ago. I'll
see if I still have the code somewhere. It might be at work, which
means I can only che
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> Has anybody with experience of WideStrings tried compiling the "new" Regexpr
> unit to support them?
Which "new" Regexpr? The one in packages/regexpr or another one?
I always thought that the one I added was focused on utf-8, although I
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Has anybody with experience of WideStrings tried compiling the "new"
Regexpr unit to support them?
I'm in a position where I could very much benefit from using these, but
I think that I'm only seeing patterns match for characters <= #$00ff and
even then am not seeing
Hi, does anyone knows if there is a Markdown parser already developed for
FreePascal?.
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
12 matches
Mail list logo
