Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
When putting text into a resourcestring, for example for i18n, what is
best practice for multiline blocks?
I'm thinking of, for example, explanatory text that goes on a page in a
wizard-style set of dialogues, or a des
In our previous episode, Mark Morgan Lloyd said:
> When putting text into a resourcestring, for example for i18n, what is
> best practice for multiline blocks?
>
> I'm thinking of, for example, explanatory text that goes on a page in a
> wizard-style set of dialogues, or a description that appea
When putting text into a resourcestring, for example for i18n, what is
best practice for multiline blocks?
I'm thinking of, for example, explanatory text that goes on a page in a
wizard-style set of dialogues, or a description that appears in a pane
when a tree node is clicked.
--
Mark Morga
On 17/08/12 13:58, LacaK wrote:
Or split header files ... but then we must also create TFBConnection
(like TIBConnection) ? ... it seems to me more complicated ATM
Correct. And it is only going to get more complicated and messy as time
goes by. So fixing it in the correct manner is best in th
Regarding FB2/FB3, FYI please note this snippet in the other thread: my
post and Michael's reply:
OT: that would be useful for another reason.
Firebird 3 will introduce the BOOLEAN datatype and other innovations
(encrypted connections, etc).
Interbase has had BOOLEAN support for a while now.
On 17/08/12 11:17, Ludo Brands wrote:
Well spotted. Outlook indeed generates "RE :" with the additional space.
This should be fixed now.
Well done, it seems to work 100% now. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourcefo
> >
> > I wrote a little VBA module in Outlook that modifies the
> RE: back to
> > Re: before sending the message and that seems to solve the problem.
>
> Almost. You now have an "Re :" in the front, and not a "Re:".
> Removing
> the space before the colon should fix it completely I think.
>
On 17-8-2012 11:47, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> I started a new message thread, as it doesn't really relate to the
> origin thread any more.
>
>
> On 17/08/12 06:50, LacaK wrote:
>> BTW: packages/ibase is intended to be translation of Firebird client >
> API not Interbase, right ?
AFAIK, it's inte
I started a new message thread, as it doesn't really relate to the
origin thread any more.
On 17/08/12 06:50, LacaK wrote:
> BTW: packages/ibase is intended to be translation of Firebird client
> API not Interbase, right ?
Yeah, the unit naming scheme is a bit dodgy at the moment. At one po
On 17/08/12 09:49, Ludo Brands wrote:
I wrote a little VBA module in Outlook that modifies the RE: back to Re:
before sending the message and that seems to solve the problem.
Almost. You now have an "Re :" in the front, and not a "Re:". Removing
the space before the colon should fix it comple
>
> > One of Ludo's later messages gives me:
> >
> > RE : RE : RE : RE : RE : [fpc-pascal] Re: linux:
> > shouldwehard-codeversionedorunversioned shared libraries in
> our apps?
> >
> > In gmail's web client, the conversation view only shows the
> original
> > subject at the top, but it's st
11 matches
Mail list logo
