> I still dont understand why FPC doesnt support circular references...
There is no way to solve that ?
Do you think Delphi or Turbo Pascal or even UCSD Pascal ever supports? The
concept of units and uses clause makes the order in which units must be
initialized (and how identifier is searched)
I still dont understand why FPC doesnt support circular references...
There is no way to solve that ?
2012/11/22 denisgolovan :
>> PasDoc can produce 'dot' files of unit dependencies. (No idea if it will
>> handle circular refs though). GraphViz can then be used to produce
>> images based on the
> PasDoc can produce 'dot' files of unit dependencies. (No idea if it will
> handle circular refs though). GraphViz can then be used to produce
> images based on the 'dot' files. I gave up with it because it did not
> parse the implementaion sections, but you won't be needing that for unit
> depend
PasDoc can produce 'dot' files of unit dependencies. (No idea if it will
handle circular refs though). GraphViz can then be used to produce
images based on the 'dot' files. I gave up with it because it did not
parse the implementaion sections, but you won't be needing that for unit
dependences.
Hi all
Now and again, I am trying to debug complex circular references.
By complex circular references I mean those which are produced by cyclic graphs
of units, not simple one unit uses another and that uses the first one.
Unfortunately, currently fpc just shows that some circular references ex
LacaK wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote / napísal(a):
running on Linux x86 (32-bit):
If Lazarus trunk is built with 2.6.0 the bug described at
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22463 does not occur.
If Lazarus trunk is built with 2.6.2 rc1 the bug is reproducible.
Is somewhere downloada
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote / napísal(a):
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Hello,
We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 2.6.2 on our ftp-servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 2.6.2 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report w
Jonas Maebe hat am 22. November 2012 um 10:03
geschrieben:
>
> On 22 Nov 2012, at 02:00, Kenneth Cochran wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
> > wrote:
> >
> >> That is an incorrect assumptions. The compiler will happily accept
> >> both
> >> types without needing type
On 22 Nov 2012, at 02:00, Kenneth Cochran wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
That is an incorrect assumptions. The compiler will happily accept
both
types without needing typecasting.
I stand corrected. I assumed it behaved the same as Delphi in this
respec
