Hello,
Now, it's possible to compile Brook in current released Free Pascal and
Lazarus, however, not yet released the new release of Brook, however you
can download a snapshot here:
https://github.com/silvioprog/brookframework/archive/master.zip
Or, for those who follow Brook via GIT, please upd
Hi,
Did someone already worked using Amazon S3 and FreePascal, maybe using
Synapse?
Is there a project open source for it?
Thanks,
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fp
Al 18/03/13 04:11, En/na Paul Ishenin ha escrit:
> '=' can't be used because it can be a part of expression. There is no
> big difference between
> with (a = SomeObject) do
> and
> with a = SomeObject do
But since "with" is only for records/objects/classes there's no possible
confusion (the resul
On 18/03/2013 03:11, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> 18.03.13, 9:27, Xiangrong Fang пишет:
>> I am sorry I didn't follow this thread although I am the "OP" :-). If
>> I understand correct, I would suggest NOT introduce the "absolute"
>> keyword, instead, make it ALWAYS absolute. i.e.:
>>
>> with a = SomeOb
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the release of Lazarus 1.0.8.
This is a bug fix release, built with the current fpc 2.6.2. The
previous release 1.0.6 was built with 2.6.0.
Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch#Fi
Am 19.03.2013 09:56, schrieb Martin Schreiber:
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:38:43 Sven Barth wrote:
Delphi has {$J-} in order to set them readonly.
Do you know whether Delphi has by default $J+ or $J-?
{$J+} in Delphi 7.
Then we don't need to change the default :)
Regards,
Sven
_
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:38:43 Sven Barth wrote:
> >
> > Delphi has {$J-} in order to set them readonly.
>
> Do you know whether Delphi has by default $J+ or $J-?
>
{$J+} in Delphi 7.
> > Another problem with Free Pascal in this context is that it is AFAIK not
> > possible to define forward typ
Am 19.03.2013 09:27, schrieb Martin Schreiber:
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:06:31 leledumbo wrote:
Really? No gain in the beloved readability?
Not for me, I always initialize code in "executable" section, keeping the
declaration section clean. That's what "readable" to me.
And it seems to me a
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:06:31 leledumbo wrote:
> > Really? No gain in the beloved readability?
>
> Not for me, I always initialize code in "executable" section, keeping the
> declaration section clean. That's what "readable" to me.
>
> > And it seems to me a "const" should not be changed by cod
> Really? No gain in the beloved readability?
Not for me, I always initialize code in "executable" section, keeping the
declaration section clean. That's what "readable" to me.
> And it seems to me a "const" should not be changed by code. ;-)
Even if it's allowed, you're declaring typed constan
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 08:11:49 Justin Smyth wrote:
> Thanks, i am waiting to hear back regarding some suggest changes that were
> suggest in the debugging section that Michael Ring was working on a while
> ago, i want to write some code in lazarus for my ARM Cortex M3 and debug it
> in lazarus (
Thanks, i am waiting to hear back regarding some suggest changes that were
suggest in the debugging section that Michael Ring was working on a while
ago, i want to write some code in lazarus for my ARM Cortex M3 and debug it
in lazarus ( via gdb using gdb from openOCD) so i can see whats going o
12 matches
Mail list logo
