Hi,
In the following program:
program worksheet;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
type
TWorksheet = packed object
private
FProp: string[5];
//FProp: Integer;
public
property Prop: ShortString read FProp;
//property Prop: Integer read FProp;
end;
begin
end.
I got an error while compile
In our previous episode, Xiangrong Fang said:
>
> worksheet.lpr(9,42) Error: Incompatible types: got "TWorksheet.ShortString"
> expected "ShortString"
>
> I wonder who defined "TWorksheet.ShortString"? Why string[5] is not
> compatible with ShortString?
Shortstring, is an alias for shortstring[2
2013/4/3 Marco van de Voort
>
> Shortstring, is an alias for shortstring[255] the maximum size. Use getters
> and setters if you want to make this work.
>
Thanks, however, I am just defining getter. So, to make this work, I need
to define things like:
type
MyProp = string[5];
then use it in
> BTW, recently there are many discussions about language features, now I
would like to ask one question, why the following is not supported in
pascal:
procedure SomeThing(AParam: array[0..10] of Integer);
or
procedure SomeThing(Aparam: string[10]);
But you have to define a custom type first?
leledumbo wrote:
BTW, recently there are many discussions about language features, now I
would like to ask one question, why the following is not supported in
pascal:
procedure SomeThing(AParam: array[0..10] of Integer);
or
procedure SomeThing(Aparam: string[10]);
But you have to define a
To whom it may concern:
I've downloaded two versions of Free Pascal, version number "2.6.0" and
version number "2.6.2", both exhibit the same problem. Also, I've loaded
the very same two versions onto MS-WndowsXP Pro, and both versions work
just fine (no problem exhibited). Here is how the probl
On 2013-04-03 07:09, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>
> Just wanted to let you know about
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_Trunk#TDBF_unit_deprecation_removed
Nice, thanks for that. I have plans on possibly using DBF on ARM based
systems (and adding support to tiOPF). DBF is the only
On 3-4-2013 9:39, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 2013-04-03 07:09, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> Nice, thanks for that. I have plans on possibly using DBF on ARM based
> systems (and adding support to tiOPF). DBF is the only "server" I know
> that you can compile into FPC executables - no dependencies
Hi,
If you want a 16bit version, then probably WideString? UTF8String is better
for many purposes though. (Though in FPC is is currently just an alias to
AnsiString).
Thank you,
Noah Silva
2013/4/3 Mark Morgan Lloyd
> leledumbo wrote:
>
>> BTW, recently there are many discussions about la
Where do you experience this behavior?
I use Lazarus 1.0.8 + FPC 2.6.2 under Win98 and in IDE for me it works
as expected also in small test application.
With EN keyboard:
- CapsLock=ON: Shift+9=(, same with CapsLock=OFF
-Laco.
To whom it may concern:
I've downloaded two versions of Free Pas
Am 03.04.2013 12:11, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
leledumbo wrote:
BTW, recently there are many discussions about language features, now I
would like to ask one question, why the following is not supported in
pascal:
procedure SomeThing(AParam: array[0..10] of Integer);
or
procedure SomeThing(A
Am 03.04.2013 11:44, schrieb leledumbo:
BTW, recently there are many discussions about language features, now I
would like to ask one question, why the following is not supported in
pascal:
procedure SomeThing(AParam: array[0..10] of Integer);
or
procedure SomeThing(Aparam: string[10]);
But
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 03.04.2013 12:11, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
I wonder if I could ask a related question. I was looking at some
parser code yesterday that I wrote years ago, and that still compiles
with TP5, TopSpeed and so on. It's got a couple of underlying
string[255] declarations: is
> It's because in Pascal you need to declare types first.
But why array[0..10] of Integer, or string[255] are not "types"? Remember
that you can use "open array" in function params anyway.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
Am 03.04.2013 16:25, schrieb Xiangrong Fang:
> It's because in Pascal you need to declare types first.
But why array[0..10] of Integer, or string[255] are not "types"?
Remember that you can use "open array" in function params anyway.
They are types, but anonymous ones.
Also do not confuse
On 03 Apr 2013, at 16:25, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
It's because in Pascal you need to declare types first.
But why array[0..10] of Integer, or string[255] are not "types"?
They are type definitions. Parameter lists cannot contain type
definitions, only previously defined types. The main reas
thanks to your suggestions, I could compile and successfully test the
'hello world' code that comes with the brook framework.
Now I am ready to wet my feet in the world of web programming.
In my company we have a few dedicated (remote) servers running linux.
And (when I will be able to get real
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, duilio foschi wrote:
thanks to your suggestions, I could compile and successfully test the 'hello
world' code that comes with the brook framework.
Now I am ready to wet my feet in the world of web programming.
In my company we have a few dedicated (remote) servers runni
If your just doing Web Development you can cross compile for linux on
windows, it's not that bad, you do need to build the cross compiler and
then copy some of the linux libs to your development pc. It's totally
possible and then you just copy the compiled app to your server, you don't
need fpc
Just a side little question: AFAIK the standard allows such a definition
inside parameter, so we're not ISO compatible at this point?
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/String-type-compatibility-tp5713952p5713971.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - Ge
I think the OP is using FP console IDE, many people just can't distinguish
IDE and compiler... (no offense)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Problem-using-Free-Pascal-in-Win98-tp5713957p5713972.html
Sent from the Free Pascal - General mailing lis
On 03 Apr 2013, at 18:29, leledumbo wrote:
> Just a side little question: AFAIK the standard allows such a definition
> inside parameter, so we're not ISO compatible at this point?
If that is indeed true, then we are not.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillis
On 4/3/13, leledumbo wrote:
> I think the OP is using FP console IDE, many people just can't distinguish
> IDE and compiler... (no offense)
If so, then he should look at http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=9437
Bart
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-p
23 matches
Mail list logo
