It's perfectly normal that both files are not generated. Why do you
expect those files there?
Because they were there before ;) (running make distclean with options
2x, make all, make install).
I've worked around the fpdoc thing, haven't looked at Linux yet. I'll do
a make install to
Op 27-05-13 21:20, Koenraad Lelong schreef:
Hi,
..
A suggestion on the hardkernel-forum said it might be an armhf problem.
Is it prossible to compile fpc from armhf ? Should I do this native ?
I mean, I have an fpc running on the hardware, but it's an armel, at
least I think it is. My
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 14:01 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Op 27-05-13 21:20, Koenraad Lelong schreef:
Hi,
..
A suggestion on the hardkernel-forum said it might be an armhf problem.
Is it prossible to compile fpc from armhf ?
There's snapshot on the ftp.
Should I do this native ?
Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef:
There's snapshot on the ftp.
Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/
Should I do this native ?
Copied the contents to /usr
Tried fpc -i, shows fpc 2.6.2, for armel.
Is there some mistake ?
Since it seems
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:48 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef:
There's snapshot on the ftp.
Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/
Should I do this native ?
Copied the contents to /usr
Tried fpc -i, shows fpc
Thomas Schatzl wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:48 +0200, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Op 29-05-13 18:16, Thomas Schatzl schreef:
There's snapshot on the ftp.
Downloaded ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v27/arm-linux-armhf/
Should I do this native ?
Copied the contents to /usr
Tried fpc
