Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: MD5 decryption?

Reinier Olislagers wrote: Please don't take this as an insult, but make sure you don't design/implement any password/encryption schemes if you don't know what you're doing... Most people who /do/ know what they're doing shouldn't try to design encryption or hashing schemes, although it must b

Re: [fpc-pascal] arm-embedded and interrupts

op 11-12-13 19:36, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen schreef: What am I doing wrong ? Thanks for any pointers. Koenraad Lelong The Cortex-M RTL units were changed some time ago to favour a more flexible way of doing interrupt handling for embedded devices, by implementing assembler support for weak refe

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

2013/12/11 Ewald > Once upon a time, silvioprog said: > > 2013/12/11 Ewald > > Go to: http://md5decryption.com > In "Please input the MD5 hash that you would like to be decrypted:" field, > put: 7db4a8dae498d1b4686ebd1f79326602 > See the result in "Decrypted Text:" field. > > Yes, I've seen t

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Once upon a time, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > You should read the description. > They look in a database. They don't do actual decryption. Euhm... Forget about my last reply to this mail (the one with the bicycle and the car), my brain read something different there. Sorry for the noise. -- Ew

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Once upon a time, Michael Van Canneyt said: > > You should read the description. > They look in a database. They don't do actual decryption. Yep, that's what I did, I even looked at the little line advertising how much records they had in their database. Most unfortunately though it cannot be call

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Once upon a time, silvioprog said: > 2013/12/11 Ewald mailto:ew...@yellowcouch.org>> > > Go to: http://md5decryption.com > In "Please input the MD5 hash that you would like to be decrypted:" > field, put: 7db4a8dae498d1b4686ebd1f79326602 > See the result in "Decrypted Te

Re: [fpc-pascal] arm-embedded and interrupts

Den 11-12-2013 19:20, Koenraad Lelong skrev: Hi, I made some time to tinker with my arm-embedded fpc-compiler. Since I had a problem in the past with routines optimized away I checked for this. And indeed there is a problem : my interrupt-routines are gone. How do I tell the compiler to leave

[fpc-pascal] arm-embedded and interrupts

Hi, I made some time to tinker with my arm-embedded fpc-compiler. Since I had a problem in the past with routines optimized away I checked for this. And indeed there is a problem : my interrupt-routines are gone. How do I tell the compiler to leave those routines in the binary ? I tried -O-, -

[fpc-pascal] Re: MD5 decryption?

On 11/12/2013 18:08, silvioprog wrote: > Ah ha... I haven't seen this detail. xD > > Phew, I was thinking it would be possible to know the hidden text in a hash. > TBH: it seems you don't know very much about encryption. Please don't take this as an insult, but make sure you don't design/impleme

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

2013/12/11 Michael Van Canneyt > > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, silvioprog wrote: > > 2013/12/11 Ewald >> Once upon a time, silvioprog said: >> > Hello, >> > >> > How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: >> MD5 is a hashing algorithm, not an encryption algorithm. There is more >> than one

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Am 11.12.2013 17:54, schrieb silvioprog: 2013/12/11 Ewald mailto:ew...@yellowcouch.org>> Once upon a time, silvioprog said: > Hello, > > How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: MD5 is a hashing algorithm, not an encryption algorithm. There is more than one input for this algorithm

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, silvioprog wrote: 2013/12/11 Ewald Once upon a time, silvioprog said: > Hello, > > How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: MD5 is a hashing algorithm, not an encryption algorithm. There is more than one input for this algorithm which will generate the same h

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

2013/12/11 Ewald > Once upon a time, silvioprog said: > > Hello, > > > > How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: > MD5 is a hashing algorithm, not an encryption algorithm. There is more > than one input for this algorithm which will generate the same hash, as > opposed to a cipher. > > -- > Ewald Go to:

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Not sure if this helps or not: http://wiki.freepascal.org/hash On 12/11/2013 10:41 AM, silvioprog wrote: Hello, How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: http://md5decryption.com -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog

Re: [fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Once upon a time, silvioprog said: > Hello, > > How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: MD5 is a hashing algorithm, not an encryption algorithm. There is more than one input for this algorithm which will generate the same hash, as opposed to a cipher. -- Ewald _

[fpc-pascal] Re: MD5 decryption?

On 11/12/2013 17:41, silvioprog wrote: > How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: > You're not supposed to. MD5 is a one way hash function. Otherwise use rainbow tables, brute force attack etc. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://li

[fpc-pascal] MD5 decryption?

Hello, How to decrypt a MD5 in FPC?: http://md5decryption.com -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

On Wed, December 11, 2013 12:39, Dennis Poon wrote: > >2.7.1 will become 2.8 sooner or later (*) and what's in trunk at that > time will also be in 2.8.0 (and normally we don't deliberately remove > things... ^^ ). > > what is the timeframe of 'sooner or later'? May I assume Q1 of 2014? My perso

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

Am 11.12.2013 12:39, schrieb Dennis Poon: >2.7.1 will become 2.8 sooner or later (*) and what's in trunk at that time will also be in 2.8.0 (and normally we don't deliberately remove things... ^^ ). what is the timeframe of 'sooner or later'? May I assume Q1 of 2014? Even if we'd branch now i

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

Am 11.12.2013 11:14, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Sven Barth wrote: Am 11.12.2013 10:05, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Bart wrote: 2.7 branch will never be a stable release. Eventually we'll get a 2.8 release. I think that needs to be made to sound more deliberate, for Dennis's benefit. Please c

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

>2.7.1 will become 2.8 sooner or later (*) and what's in trunk at that time will also be in 2.8.0 (and normally we don't deliberately remove things... ^^ ). what is the timeframe of 'sooner or later'? May I assume Q1 of 2014? Dennis ___ fpc-pascal m

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

Sven Barth wrote: Am 11.12.2013 10:05, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Bart wrote: 2.7 branch will never be a stable release. Eventually we'll get a 2.8 release. I think that needs to be made to sound more deliberate, for Dennis's benefit. Please could any of the core team jump on me if some deta

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

Am 11.12.2013 10:05, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: Bart wrote: 2.7 branch will never be a stable release. Eventually we'll get a 2.8 release. I think that needs to be made to sound more deliberate, for Dennis's benefit. Please could any of the core team jump on me if some detail's wrong, but:

Re: [fpc-pascal] when will Free Pascal have a stable release of 2.7.2?

Bart wrote: 2.7 branch will never be a stable release. Eventually we'll get a 2.8 release. I think that needs to be made to sound more deliberate, for Dennis's benefit. Please could any of the core team jump on me if some detail's wrong, but: 1.x is obsolete, consideration of whether it's s