[fpc-pascal] [ARM-Android] Safe values for -Cp and -Cf

2014-01-26 Thread leledumbo
In case I would like to have at least 2011 devices as minimum targets, what are the safe values for them? Are -CpARMv6 -CfSOFT enough? Or either could be made better? -- View this message in context:

Re: [fpc-pascal] ExtractStrings skips empty string parts?

2014-01-26 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, silvioprog wrote: Hello, Conforms issue #16043: ExtractStrings in the Classes unit skips over empty text. For example: Yes. This is delphi compatible. The only possibility is to add a new argument ExtractEmpty : Boolean = False; which would, when set to true, also

Re: [fpc-pascal] ExtractStrings skips empty string parts?

2014-01-26 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2014/1/26 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, silvioprog wrote: Hello, Conforms issue #16043: ExtractStrings in the Classes unit skips over empty text. For example: Yes. This is delphi compatible. I can imagine that the Delphi developers started from a

[fpc-pascal] overload question (variant vs enum subrange)

2014-01-26 Thread Martin Frb
TFoo1 is a sub range of FFoo And it seems to match both TFoo and variant. project1.lpr(24,3) Error: Can't determine which overloaded function to call project1.lpr(15,11) Hint: Found declaration: Bar(TFoo); project1.lpr(11,11) Hint: Found declaration: Bar(Variant); No other type seems to be

[fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Fred van Stappen
Hello. Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ? If no, what do you think about that ? I know, it will be lot of work (like create a Delhi_Compatiblizer class...) but it could be great for people who want a lighter compiler...(like me, who have already done, since

[fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread fredvs
Hello. Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ? If no, what do you think about that ? I know, it will be lot of work (like create a Delhi_Compatiblizer class...) PS : I absolutely do not want to hurt somebody, it is only a proposition. - Many thanks ;-) --

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Fred van Stappen
Ooops, sorry for 2X same topic... I used http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/ for first topic it responds that the message was refused... So i sent the second one, as usual, with hotmail.com... Fred

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
On 01/26/2014 11:00 PM, fredvs wrote: Hello. Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ? If no, what do you think about that ? I know, it will be lot of work (like create a Delhi_Compatiblizer class...) PS : I absolutely do not want to hurt somebody, it is only a

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Howard Page-Clark
On 26/01/2014 21:20, Fred van Stappen wrote: Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ? If no, what do you think about that ? I know, it will be lot of work (like create a Delhi_Compatiblizer class...) but it could be great for people who want a lighter

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Fred van Stappen
What extent of Delphi incompatibility would satisfy you? {$objfpc} has offered 'mild' incompatibility for many years. What additional incompatibilities are you looking for? Howard Hum, maybe i do not explain good the proposition... I do not want a other {$define not Delphi}, i would

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Fred van Stappen
Re-hum,... It seams to me that fpc do not need delphi-compatibility to compile himself (or i miss something). So it could be possible to compile fpc without any Delphi-compatible module (Yes/No). But maybe it does not will change lot of things, only it will make fpc a few lighter (so forget

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread waldo kitty
On 1/26/2014 4:00 PM, fredvs wrote: Hello. Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ? does {$mode objpfc} not suit your needs? ;) or whatever the default is? O:) -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. Please keep mailing list traffic

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Fred van Stappen
Ok, i will try to explain better. When you compile fpc, you do make clean + make all. Is it possible to configure fpc-compil and disable Delphi compatibility...? If not possible, no problem, i only want to know :-) . Fred

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Fred van Stappen
Hello Waldo. Aaargh, there is double-topic, can you look at the twins topic ? Thanks. ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] ExtractStrings skips empty string parts?

2014-01-26 Thread silvioprog
2014-01-26 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, silvioprog wrote: Hello, Conforms issue #16043: ExtractStrings in the Classes unit skips over empty text. For example: Yes. This is delphi compatible. The only possibility is to add a new argument ExtractEmpty

Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?

2014-01-26 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Mon, January 27, 2014 01:38, Fred van Stappen wrote: Ok, i will try to explain better. When you compile fpc, you do make clean + make all. Is it possible to configure fpc-compil and disable Delphi compatibility...? If not possible, no problem, i only want to know :-) . Short and