Hi all,
I have compiled a simple mips/linux application with using raspberry pi,
when I execute the app. it replies with this error. Device is onion omega.
Illegal instruction.
Here is my application output and the source.
file testmips
testmips: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS32 version 1
On Monday 09 November 2015 23:57:30 Bo Berglund wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:19:12 +0100, Martin Schreiber
>
> wrote:
> >On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> >> So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
> >> matching 2.6.4,
> >
> >FPC 2.6.4 has
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:03:42 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
I have googled extensively now and not found this, so please tell me
how I can get fpc 2.6.4 sources from svn.
svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/fpc_2_6_4 fpc-2.6.4 did
not work...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:19:12 +0100, Martin Schreiber
wrote:
>On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
>> matching 2.6.4,
>
>FPC 2.6.4 has no support for EABIHF AFAIK. I have a patched 2.6.4 version with
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:03:42 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I have googled extensively now and not found this, so please tell me
>> how I can get fpc 2.6.4 sources from svn.
>> svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/fpc_2_6_4 fpc-2.6.4 did
>> not work...
>
>Use the
Bo Berglund wrote:
I have googled extensively now and not found this, so please tell me
how I can get fpc 2.6.4 sources from svn.
svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/fpc_2_6_4 fpc-2.6.4 did
not work...
Don't. Use the source link at http://www.freepascal.org/download.var
If you really
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:15:06 +0100, Sven Barth
wrote:
>Am 09.11.2015 17:05 schrieb "Bo Berglund" :
>>
>> I have googled extensively now and not found this, so please tell me
>> how I can get fpc 2.6.4 sources from svn.
>> svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/fpc_2_6_4 fpc-2.6.4 did
>> not
Am 09.11.2015 17:05 schrieb "Bo Berglund" :
>
> I have googled extensively now and not found this, so please tell me
> how I can get fpc 2.6.4 sources from svn.
> svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/fpc_2_6_4 fpc-2.6.4 did
> not work...
It's release_2_6_4 not fpc_2_6_4.
Regards,
Sven
__
I have googled extensively now and not found this, so please tell me
how I can get fpc 2.6.4 sources from svn.
svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/fpc_2_6_4 fpc-2.6.4 did
not work...
--
Bo Berglund
Developer in Sweden
___
fpc-pascal maillist
On Monday 09 November 2015 11:35:05 Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>
> So. I'd suggest that you start off with Martin's binary, build the
> matching 2.6.4,
FPC 2.6.4 has no support for EABIHF AFAIK. I have a patched 2.6.4 version with
EABIHF support but I suggest to use FPC 3.0 or fixes_3_0 instead.
I
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
> Not to be a stickler, but that is not an ideal interface either (in my
> eyes). Not everything is a "file", so EOF (End-of-File) was really not a
> good choice. eg: Iterating characters in a String, Objects in a
> ObjectList etc... none re
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:18:51 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
I think my 2.6.4 is OK because I got it as follows (from my notes):
wget
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Linux/2.6.4/fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
tar xvf fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
cd f
On 2015-11-08 18:38, leledumbo wrote:
> It := SomeContainer.Iterator;
> while not It.EOF do begin
> ...
> It.Next;
> end;
Not to be a stickler, but that is not an ideal interface either (in my
eyes). Not everything is a "file", so EOF (End-of-File) was really not a
good choice. eg: Iterating c
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 16:18:51 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I think my 2.6.4 is OK because I got it as follows (from my notes):
>> wget
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Linux/2.6.4/fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
>> tar xvf fpc-2.6.4.arm-linux.tar
>> cd fpc-2.6.
> I'd say don't change. In my opinion the need to restructure one's code
outweighs that disadvantage. If anything then add a for-in compatible
iterator like was done for TVector<>.
Didn't realize that the support is already there, I'll just change to for-in
loop then. Silly me :S
--
View thi
15 matches
Mail list logo